This site is dedicated to the restoration and preservation of 1960's and '70's Musclecars. I will answer any and all questions about what is original, and what are "Period Correct" modifications. I will also post my personal opinion about what is and is not proper. People are encouraged to debate me or share their own opinions or experiences.
Sunday, July 26, 2020
More on what upgrades are ok....
Had some more debates about modifications to musclecars. Here's my take-everybody did something to their cars back in the day. Just like now. If you bought a new 5.0 Mustang or Hemi Challenger today would you leave it bone-stock for the next 20 years? Probably not-chances are you'd add a Cat-Back Flowmaster exhaust, a Hurst shifter, a K&N air filter. Maybe some aftermarket wheels. More hardcore guys might add a Magnussen blower. So a '68 Camaro with a 327 that has an Edelbrock "Tarantula" manifold, a 650 Holley, headers, and some Cragar S/S mags is just as "Right" today as it was in 1971. Now a '68 Camaro with an LS3, a 4L80E, and 20 inch Center Lines is not cool. See what I'm saying? As long as the mods are "Period Correct" and don't irreversibly damage the value of the car-like cutting up the trunk for wheel tubs-I'd say it's ok. This includes changing engines and transmissions. A guy I know bought a six-cylinder, 3-speed Camaro at an auction. He dropped in a mild 350, a Saginaw 4-speed, added some rally wheels, spoilers and stripes, and now everyone "oohs" and "aahs" over his "Z/28". Another guy bought a gorgeous '64 Cutlass convertible. He chucked the 330 V8 / ST300 2-speed, and dropped in a 403 / TH350 combo. He also added front disc brakes and front and rear sway bars pirated from a '75 Gran Prix. The improvement in performance and handling was stunning. And to the casual observer-they wouldn't notice an HEI distributor-the car looks stock. Now again-if he'd stuffed an LS motor and a 6-speed in it, I'd be griping about him messing up a nice car. I'd even say a little cross-breeding is ok if it's "Period Correct". A few examples I've seen-a guy had a '71 Pontiac Ventura-Pontiac's version of the Nova. A lot of them had 250 inch Chevy Sixes, or 307 Chevy V8s. Some had 350 Pontiacs. His was a 307 version. He chucked the 307 and dropped in a stompin' 383 inch Small-block Chevy. Now for him to put "Real" Pontiac power in it-he'd not only have to change the engine-but the transmission as well-Chevys and BOP engines have different bellhousing bolt-patterns. Further-all the accessories-power steering, alternator, water pump, fuel pump. belt pulleys-are all different. So dropping in the Chevy motor was the path of least resistance. And who cares if a 307 Ventura now has a 383 in it? Another guy had a '64 Tempest with a stompin' 425 Olds V8 in it. He had 11 second time slips for it. Now if it was a numbers-matching Tri-Power GTO with an Olds engine in it, I would take issue. But a 326 Tempest? What? There's one less Fake GTO running around? Thank god for that. Another guy had a '66 El Camino with a 389 Pontiac in it, that was a rocket. And no, it was not an SS396. I read an article in a magazine-I think it was "Street Rodder"-about a guy that bought a '57 Chevy that had been a race car since 1962, and had always been campaigned with a Pontiac engine. I thought it was really cool that instead of spending a gazillion dolars returning it to "Just as it left the Factory" he was restoring it as a race car-complete with "incorrect" Pontiac engine and he was going to run it at vintage drag events. In the same issue a guy had a beautiful 1961 Impala-that had a 500 Cadillac / TH400 powertrain. Moved the big car way quicker than the 283 / Powerglide combo it replaced. Chevy purists will gripe-but again-it's an Impala-not a Split-Window Fuel-Injected Stingray!! And at least it doesn't have F%^&in' LS motor in it!!! Like everything in every magazine. Mastermind
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment