The 442 turns 50...

In 1964 Pontiac turned the automotive world on it's ear. When they dropped the "Big Car" 389 onto the compact Tempest and created the GTO, the musclecar era was launched. Olds quickly countered with the 442 Package which stood for 4 barrel carb, 4-speed transmission, dual exhaust. The 330 V8 Cutlasss 442 was a nicely balanced package-but just like a 327 Malibu-couldn't really compete with a 389 GTO. The minions at Chevrolet waited for an official ruling from GM-that's why the SS396 Chevelle wasn't introduced until 1966. The renegades at Oldsmobile figured- screw 'em-Pontiac broke the rules-DeLorean griping about Olds offereing the 330 as a step-down engine in the 88, and saying the GTO was an "Option" skirting te small car / small engine big car / big engine rule. In 1965 they put their big 400 inch V8 in the Cutlass 442 making it competitive with the GTO. Oddly-Maybe Olds didn't advertise like Pontiac did-I don't know-Pontiac sold 75,000 GTOs and Olds only sold 25,000 442s. In 1966 Olds even offered a 3-2bbl version just like Pontiac did. However- again-they are quite rare. In 1967 Disc brakes were offered, the Hurst Dual / Gate shifter, and many others. In 1968 all the GM "A" bodies were redesigned. The 442 had a 400 V8, but the Hurst / Olds-concieved by George Hurst had a special silver and black paint job and flouting GM's rule that intermediates couldn't have engines larger than 400 cubes-had the fire-breathing 455 from the Toronado. Only 515 were built, but the performance image was there. Same for 1969 except the H / O was white and Gold. 1970 was the pinnacle year for the 442. The "W30" 455 V8 had an aluminum intake, special heads, a 328 degree cam and was so hot it was only available with a 4-speed and 3.90 or 4.33:1 gears, and no power brakes-because it didn't have enough vacuum at idle to operate power brakes or an automatic transmission!! It was GROSSLY under-rated at 370 hp, and could easily compete with the 450 hp LS6 Chevelle. 1971 brought lowered compression ratios across the board. 1972 had the H /O as the Indy pace car again, but only 629 were built. Sadly-like Pontiac with the GTO, the 442 reverted to option staus on the Cutlass. Thus it was possible to have a mean-looking machine that wheezed out 160 hp with a 350  with a 2bbl!!!  Olds just gave up on performance and concentrated on luxury. The "W30" package-with a few changes-could have lasted until 1979 just like the 400 Pontiacs in the Trans-Am. But they gave up. The 455 was optional in the Cutlass until 1976-but by then it wheezed out 190 hp, and there was no manual transmission option, and the stiffest axle ratio was a 2.56:1!!  Gee, why was Pontiac selling T/A's with 400s and 455s with 4-speeds and 3.23:1 or 3.42:1 gears that ran???  In the '70's and '80's Olds put the legendary 442 Moniker on a bunch of slugs. The worst was 1985-87. You got a 2 door Cutlass with a tape stripe appearance package, "Monte Carlo SS" suspension, and a 307 inch Olds V8 that wheezed out 140 hp and could only be backed by a 4-speed automatic. While Buick was making Grand Nationals on the same platform that ran low 14s or high 13s off the showroom floor!!!  Why didn't Olds lobby for a version of that??  Because they didn't care. The Cutlass was the best-selling American car for many yers in the '70's and '80's. They just didn't give a shit. The Rental-car fleet money was rolling in, and the baby boomers were aging and not caring about muscle-so Olds didn't. But Like Danny DeVito said in "Other Peoples Money" "Get an Increasing Share of a Shrinking Market" "Down the Tubes."  That's why theres no mor Oldsmobile and there's still a Chevrolet and Buick. They changed with the times. Olds didn't. And that's sad-because while it lasted- a 442 was a cool alternative to an SS Chevelle or a GTO.  Mastermind    

The GTO turns 50.....

In late 1963 GM handed down it's famous ban on racing. This was going to hurt sales immensely-especially at Pontiac-who had climbed from sixth to third in total US car sales mainly because of their high-performance image. That's where the term "Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday." came from. Smokey Yunick and Fireball Roberts were unstoppable in NASCAR in their fire-breathing Pontiacs. Roberts won 22 races in 1961-62 a feat unequalled until Richard Petty won 27 in 1970. Mickey Thompson and Hayden Proffit dominated stock class drag racing in their 421 Catalina. Up until then performance cars were primarily full-size cars. At that time-GM also had a rule-big cars got big engines, small cars got small engines. No intermediate could have a standard engine over 330 cubic inches. Oldsmobile dropped the 330 V8 into the 88 sedan and dropped the price-a direct assault on the Pontiac Catalina. This angered DeLorean, who was working with Jim Wangers and Pete Estes to develop a perfromance street car since racing wasn't allowed. They dropped the 389 V8 out of the big cars into the compact Tempest and called it the GTO. DeLorean had hoped to sell 10,000 units; it was a huge hit-even though it was a mid-year option they sold 32,450. The other GM divisions howled to the high heavens and demanded the car be killed. Oldsmobile quickly countered with the Cutlass 442 performance package-but with only 330 cubes under the hood, all it would see of a GTO would be the taillights. DeLorean said-and rightly so-the rule was no intermediate could have a STANDARD engine over 330 cubes. The GTO package was an extra-cost OPTION. And, the GM brass never argued with sales success so the car was here to stay. In 1965 they changed the bodystyle a little and Both engines got more hp the 4bbl 389 was bumped from 325 hp to 335, and the Tri-Power version got bumped from 348 hp to 360. Sales more than doubled-75,000 units were sold. The Goats were king of the street. A 406 Ford Galaxie or a 409 Chevy Impala or a 413 Plymouth Belvedere-all full-size cars would get their lunch eaten by a GTO. The 389 had almost as much power-but the Tempest was several hundred pounds lighter. A 327 Chevelle or a 289 Mustang had little chance in a drag race with a GTO. Olsmobile quickly followed Pontiac's lead and dropped their 400 inch V8 into the 442-which made them competitive but they only sold 1/3 of the units-25,000. In 1966 the freight train rolled on. Sales hit 96,000 units, an all-time high. Chevrolet finally countered with the SS396 Chevelle-and with a dealer network twice the size of Pontiac's-could only sell 77,000 units. 1967 brought some good changes. The body was still basically the same as the record-setting '66 except for the taillights. Front disc brakes became an option for the first time, and for automatic buyers the crappy two-speed ST300 ( read Powerglide ) was replaced by the excellent 3-speed TH400 and could be had with a Hurst Dual / Gate shifter. Engine size was increased to 400 cubic inches, and the heads were completely re-designed to breathe much better. However the 3-2bbl Tri-Power option-which had been a Pontiac Performance staple since 1959 was dropped. GM had said they wanted no more multi-carb options. Zora-Arkus Duntov and Chevrolet defied the order-the 427 Corvette had a 3-2bbl option until 1969-but everyone else toed the line. The buff magazines cried bloody murder. You could order all the parts through dealership parts departments and the '65-66 setup would bolt up to the new engines, and some dealers like Royal Pontiac would even install them if you paid extra. In reality-the 400 4bbl was actually a BETTER perfomer than the 389 Tri-Powers. sales dropped a little-but they still sold 81,000 units. By 1968 the musclecar movement was in full swing. The body was completely re-designed and Motor Trend named it the "Car of the Year".  Chrysler introduced the Road Runner-basically a taxicab stripped down Satellite with a hopped up 383 V8 as standard equipment and the 440 and the 426 Hemi optional. Dodge had the Super Bee-basically the same package on the Coronet. Ford stuffed the 390 V8 into the Mustang, and Chevrolet had introduced the Camaro in 1967 and you could get a 396 in it. Pontiac of course got the Firebird-their version of the Camaro and you could get a 400 in a Firebird. With all this competition they still sold 87,000 units. 1969 brought the introduction of the Ram Air III and Ram Air IV engines and the "Judge" package. However-the other car companies were busy too. Ford stuffed the Police Interceptor 428 into the new Mustang Mach 1, and Chrysler introduced the legendary 440 "Six-Pack" in the Road Runner and the Super Bee. Some dealers-like Nickey Chevrolet, and Don Yenko were stuffing L72 Corvette 427s into Camaros and Chevelles. Still sales were strong-72,225 units. In 1970 GM lifted their stupid rule that intermediates could only have 400 cubic inch engines. Chevrolet immediately stuffed a 454 in the Chevelle-the LS6 had a rip-snorting 450 horses, and that was probably under-rated. Oldsmobile put a 455 into the 442-the "W30" package had an aluminum intake,a 328 degree cam and was so hot it could only be ordered with a 4-speed and no power brakes-it didn't have enough vacuum at idle to operate them! It was grossly under-rated at 370 hp. Buick even got into the fray with the GS455 Skylark, and the Fire-breathing GSX. Chrysler introduced the 'Cuda and Challenger-basically Camaro / Firebird fighters-and they could be had with any engine including the 426 Hemi and the 440 Six-Pack. Strangely, probably because DeLorean had left-Pontiac didn't use the 455. You could get a 455 in a GTO-but it was a generic, "Station Wagon" engine. The high-performance engines were still the RAIII and RAIV 400s. If Pontiac had put the RAIV heads, intake and cam on the 455 block-they could have been competitive with these other monsters. But they didn't, and for the first time there were a lot of cars that could put a GTO on the trailer-something that just didn't happen in the first five years. And Insurance companies were cracking down on performance cars-often the insurance premiums were as much as the car payments!!  Sales dropped way off-40,149 units were sold-almost half of 1969's production. In 1971 due to ever tightening emissions standards and invention of low-lead gasoline-compression ratios were lowered across the board by all GM divisions. Pontiac did build a performance 455-the 455 HO used the heads and aluminum intake from the RAIV, with the milder "068" cam. It was under-rated at 335 hp and 480 lbs of torque. Didn't help-sales dropped to 10,000 units, a 1/4 of 1970's, which was half of 1969's. In 1972 the GTO was no longer a separate model-for the first time since 1964 it reverted to being an option on the LeMans. The 455HO was still available, but sales dropped to a meager 5,807 units. A United Auto Workers strike in 1972 probably didn't help either. The GM "A" bodies were all redesigned for 1973-the hated "Collonade" hardtops. With 5-mph bumpers-they were just plain ugly. 4,806 units were sold-the lowest ever. It was clear to everyone that the Trans-Am was now the flagship. In 1974 the engineers decided to return to it's roots-a big engine in a small car. The GTO was made an option on the "X" body-( read Nova ) platform. Since Pontiac engines are externally identical from a 326 to a 455-and the 350 was an option in the Ventura-the engineers wanted to put a 400 in the Ventura GTO. Now that would have been a rocket!!  ( I know, because I stuffed the 400 out of my wrecked '77 T/A into a '71 Ventura and it was quite a sleeper ). A Ventura weighed 3,200 lbs-about 600 lbs less than a Firebird. A 400 Ventura / GTO would have blown the doors off even an SD-455 Trans-Am-and that couldn't happen-the T/A was the cash cow. So the GTO got a 350 V8 that wheezed out 200hp. The buff magazines cried bloody murder. You could still get a 400 with a 4-speed or a 455 with a TH400 in the LeMans and the Grand Am-which were more GTO-like than the gussied up Ventura. So the car that started it all was put to rest. T/A sales soared in the late '70s, and remained the flagship until GM killed the F-bodies at the end of 2002. In 2004 GM put the GTO name on the Australian Holden Monaro. It had the 350 hp 5.7 liter LS1 'Vette motor and a great suspension. In 2005 they upped the ante with the 400hp LS2 'Vette motor. They didn't sell. The problem was the styling. It looked like a Grand Am with fat tires. Car and Driver called it the "Best Car Nobody's Buying". They hit it right on the head-"It runs like a Corvette, handles like a BMW, and looks like a rental car."  If Pontiac had done what Ford did with the Mustang and Dodge did with the Challenger-go retro and make it look like a '60's or '70's model-they's have had people lined up around the block-Ford can't build enough Mustangs fast enough, and the Challenger is selling like hot cakes. A sad end to a great idea. But if you want a GTO-you'll have to find a '64-72 model.  Mastermind            

"Subjective" is Bullshit....We need to be Objective.....

I'm sorry to deride magazine writers because I sometimes write for magazines-but I just have to vent this. We have to stop the Calvin ( Of "Calvin and Hobbes" comic strip fame peeing on a Ford or Chevy emblem ) pissing shit. I love how magazine writers can rank one car ahead of another because they personally like it better-even though the numbers show otherwise. Here's a couple examples. I work in a Subaru dealership so this one really pisses me off. Car and Driver had a "Sport Sedan" showdown comparing the base model WRX ( not the STI ) against the VW Jetta Hot rod, the Mazda Speed 3, the Honda Civic SI,and the Ford Focus ST. The WRX was the fastest 0-60, the fastest in the 1/4 mile,had the highest top speed,the shortest stopping distance from 70 mph, the fastest lap time around Willow Springs Raceway,and the highest "G" rating on the skidpad. Basically it was #1 in every performance category, and except for the Honda, had the lowest price!!!. Yet the writers rated it #2 behind the Volkswagen!!!  Huh?  How does that work? What math are they doing?  This is not an isolated example. A couple years ago Motor Trend compared a Mustang GT against a BMW M3. They even titled the article "America's M3". The Mustang had 412 hp, the BMW 414. The Mustang was equal or better in every performance category-0-60, 1/4 mile, 70-0 braking, lap time around the track etc-and the Mustang cost $29,000 versus the M3's $64,000 price tag nd they still rated the BMW #1.  Excuse me? The Mustang was equal or better in every performance category and was half the price, and you still rate the Bimmer #1??  How does that work?  I remember a "Crate Motor Shootout" that Hot Rod did back in the '90's same thing. The Chevy was a '69 Camaro with a ZZ3 350 crate engine and 4 speed, the Ford was a '92 Mustang with a 345 hp SVO 302 and a 5-speed, and the Mopar was a '73 Duster with a 360 MP Performance crate engine with a Torqueflite. Even though it was an automatic and the other two were sticks, and they all had basically the same hp rating-The Chevy and Ford were both rated at 345 hp and the Mopar was rated at 360-when the Duster blew their doors off by by a wide margin-more than half a second-which in a drag race-is about 5 car lengths-the editors said that the Mopar had a "rough idle" and only had 10 inches of vacuum at idle!!  Excuse me?  Is your Magazine not called "Hot Rod?"  We weren't comparing a Toyota Camry and a Honda Accord and a Ford Taurus in a "Family Sedan Showdown".  I fail to see how "Idle Quality" factors into a "Hot Rod Crate Motor Shootout". But of course-even though it was the slowest-they said they liked the Chevy best. Shocker!!!  Anyhow-numbers don't lie-we need to remember that and grade accordingly in "Fair" comparisons. Mastermind      

For major bucks it better be perfect....Part2...

Like Dennis Miller used to say-"Sorry to get off on a rant here" but I can't help it. I can't believe the prices some people are asking for piece of shit musclecars. I guess some people are paying it, because that's the market. But I see total crap priced the same as diamonds. Here's a good example-I was searching for GTO's on the 'net. I found a numbers matching, original, 69,000 mile Ram Air IV GTO with the special "OW" TH400 and 4.33:1 Posi rear for $45,000. That's a screaming deal. On the same website some idiot wanted $39,000 for a base-model 1968 GTO that's been "in storage" but hadn't been started or driven since 1991!!! How do you know then engine isn't locked up?  Or the Tranny toast? Or the wiring harness chewed to death by rodents in 23 years of storage??!!  And the owner want's 40 freaking grand for this piece of crap??!!!  When I can buy a running, low-mileage, documented RAIV for 5K more???!!!  Here's another one-more Pontiacs-sorry I love them-but it still drives the point home. These two were both pristine-but the price difference was staggering. A 1978 400, 4-speed, WS6 T/A with 44,000 original miles for $19,900!!!  Or a 1976 400, 4-speed T/A with 36,000 miles for $39,995!!  Hmmm? Which line would I be in?  I guess it comes down to "Buyer Beware". And buyer have common sense. At the last Hot August Nights Auction here in Reno I saw the stupidest thing ever. A "Clone" 1970 Challenger T/A sold for $32,000. The seller admitted it wasn't numbers-matching, that it was a gussied-up 318 model with a 360 crate motor and the "Six-Pak" induction setup. Some moron paid 32 grand for it. About an hour later, at the same auction-a "Real" numbers-matching-albeit a tad rougher-but still in really good shape for a 44 year old car-Challenger T/A went through for 24K.  Hello???!!! Someone paid 8 grand MORE for a FAKE than you could buy the real deal for??  When did 2+2 equal 3?  In Hemmings motor news in the Ford section I saw a 1969 Shelby GT350 Mustang for sale for $75,000. In the same issue-and they had pictures-and it was hard to tell which one was nicer-I saw another one for $44,000!!!  Neither amount is not chump change-but the red one didn't look 30 grand nicer than the blue one!!!!  All I can say is take Smokey Robinson's advice- "My Mama Told Me, You Better Shop Around".  Mastermind          

For major bucks it better be perfect......

I'm amazed at the musclecars that people are asking insane prices for-and the cars are screwed up. RK motors in North Carolina sells a lot of classic cars. They were advertising a 1970 Hemi Charger for $79,000. It wasn't a "Real" Hemi car-then the price would have been 150K. This was a 318 model that someone put a Mopar Performance Crate Hemi in, and a 4-speed and a Dana 60 rear end. But it had 4-wheel drum brakes!!!  Yeah, I want a 4,000 lb car with 465 hp and brakes that fade after one hard stop!!!  Not!! I mean the builder couldn't spend another 800 bucks putting front disc brakes on it?  Like Ditka says-"Come on,Man!!".  They had a 1968 SS396 Chevelle for sale for $49,995. It had no power steering. Anyone ever try to park a car or truck with a big-block Chevy in it and manual steering? Not a pleasant experience. I don't care if it's numbers-matching and "Came from the factory" that way. For 50 grand, it should have power steering and be decent to drive. And again-adding a power box, pump and hoses would have cost what-a grand? And would the value of the car really be "Compromised" by having power steering???  Trans-Am Specialties was trying to sell a 1973 Firebird Formula 455 that was supposedly a numbers matching car, for $38,000. They showed a picture of the dash and the gas guage clearly said "Unleaded Fuel Only". Except-Catalytic Converters and unleaded gas didn't debut until 1975!!  What-you couldn't spend 100 bucks at Year One or NPD and get a correct guage? You had to get one out of a junkyard from a '75-81 model??!!!  And hope no one notices???  For damn near 40 grand it better be perfect!!  They wanted 40 grand for a 455 / 4-speed '73 T/A-that had a big rip in the driver's seat!!!  For god sakes-you can't spend 100 bucks at an upholstery shop getting it patched, or a couple hundred with Legendary for a replacement cover??!!!  If these cars were "fixer uppers" that they wanted 5 or 10 grand for I'd understand, but if I'm going to lay out 40 or 50 grand for a car it better be right. Would you pay 40 grand for a BMW with ripped seats??  Unbelievable. Mastermind        

Some "Muscle Trucks" that might be cool....

If you want to go fast, but occasionally need to haul or tow stuff, there's a lot of cool trucks that make great muscle machines. Here's some of my favorites that can be bought reasonably. #1. 1967-79 Chevy / GMC 2wd 1/2 ton. Small-block versions can be made to run, but the ones to look for are 396 models- ( '67-72 ) and 454 models ( '73-79 ). There is a ton of suspension and brake upgrades, and nothing makes more power for less money than a big-block Chevy. # 2. 1972-78 Dodge 2wd 1/2 ton. The ones to look for are the 400 snd 440 versions. Not as much speed equipment available as the Chevys, but a 440 V8 in a 3900 lb machine is a potent ride whether it's a '70 Road Runner or a '78 Stepside. The '78-79 Li'l Red Express models have a "Cult" following, but their pricier and only have a 360 under the hood. # 3. 1967-79 Ford F100 / F150. The ones to look for are the 390 models ( '67-72 ) and 460 models ( '73-79 ). # 4. 1989-93 Chevy SS454. These had a sinister black paint job,fat tires on chrome wheels and a 454 backed by a TH400 or a 700R4 and 3.73:1 or 4.10:1 gears. Dynamite if you can find one. # 5. 1992-95 Ford Lightning. These had a special lowered suspension, a hotted up 351W and cool monochromatic paint. These have a ton of aftermarket equipment available. # 6. 1998-2003 Dodge Dakota R/T. Mother Mopar stuffed a 360 V8 in the lightweight Dakota pickup, gave it a lowered suspension, fat 17" tires and wheels and a 3.92:1 posi rear. 0-60 in six seconds flat and the 1/4 in the high 14s made these way cool. # 7. 1997-2003 Ford Lightning / Harley Davidson F150. These had cool graphics, special seats, lowered suspesnions and 18" or 20" wheels and a snarling 380 hp Supercharged 5.4 liter V8. Jules' Wallet that can haul plywood. Any of these are a great way to go fast and have some utility. Mastermind

Mustangs in movies......

After the post about Trans-Ams in movies I had quite a few people ask about Mustangs in the movies. Mustangs are fairly prevalent as they've always been a popular car. Here's some of the Instances I remember. # 1. Bullitt. Obvisusly the most famous one-The Highland Green '68 390 Fastback with Torq-Thrust mags has been copied for more than 40 years, and they still look cool.  # 2. "Diamonds Are Forever" James Bond Flick with a convoluted plot and two homosexual asassins after Bond. The only redeeming qualities are a young Jill St. John spends a lot of time barefoot in a bikini, and her and Sean Connery lead the bad guys on a decent chase through the streets of Las Vegas in a red '71 Mach 1. Otherwise its one of worst Bond Films. # 3. "The Mechanic". Charles Bronson should have got an Oscar for his portrayal of a lonely hitman who suffered from insomnia and migraine headaches, who takes the reckless son of one his victims under his wing. Great action, and his protege-a young Jan-Michael Vincent-drives a red '72 Mach 1. # 4. "Gone in 60 Seconds". To quote Tracie Thoms in "Death Proof"-"The original H.B. Halicki classic, not that Nic Cage / Angelina Jolie bullshit"  40 full minutes of automotive mayhem in a Yellow '73 Mach 1 nicknamed "Eleanor". # 5. "Charlie's Angel's" Farrah Fawcett and later Cheryl Ladd drove the white Mustang II fastback with blue stripes. Jaclyn Smith drove an orange Mustang coupe, and poor Kate Jackson got stuck with a Pinto. Come on Ford, even David Doyle ( "Bosley" ) got a T-Bird. Let's be honest no one gave a shit about the cars-guys from 14 to 40 tuned in droves to see Farrah, Jaclyn or Cheryl barefoot in bikinis, or occasionally chloroformed and tied up. Not only did she get screwed driving a Pinto-poor Kate-the "smart" one always had to stay dressed and help Bosley save the others when they were in peril. Hey-we didn't have internet porn back then, so it lasted 5 seasons.  # 6. "Basic Insticnct" All everyone remembers is Sharon Stone getting naked a lot. I remember the scene where Micheal Douglas rips Jeanne Tripplehorn's clothes off and bends her over the couch as hotter than any scene with Sharon. I also remember him bounding up hills in a '91 "5.0" Convertible after "Roxy" tries to kill him with the black Lotus Esprit. # 7. "The Getaway" 1994 version. Sorry guys-a then 41 year old Kim Basinger, while still hot in a Milf / Cougar way-compared to the 24 year old Ali MacGraw in the original? No contest-Ali all the way. In fact Steve McQueen left his wife for her, and she left producer Robert Towne for Steve, so torrid was the affair they had while filming the 1972 original. I'm not just picking on Kim-Alec Baldwin dreams he's as cool as Steve McQueen, and Michael Madsen-while good in Reservoir Dogs-can't touch Al Lettieri as the evil, sexually deviant gunfighter Rudy. And Roger Donaldson vs Sam Peckinpah for director? To plagairize MC Hammer- "Can't touch this."  However Baldwin did drive a '93 "5.0" Convertible, and James Woods was way more evil than Ben Johnson, as Jack Benyon-but that couldn't save it. The original is still way better. # 8 "Hannibal". This sequel to "Silence of the Lambs" brought back Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter, but had Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling. I think Julianne Moore is sexy-and if you read the books, is way closer to Author Thomas Harris's vision of Starling than dykey Jodie Foster. Anyhow- she drove an '88 Roush Mustang in the book and the movie, but sadly no car chase action. #9 "Marked for Death" This Steven Seagal stinker has him driving a sinister black '73 Mach 1, that gets wrecked, and then the big chase is between a Dodge Ramcharger and a BMW 633CSI. Yeah, right-a 318 Ramcharger could stay with a 633CSI for about half a block. Gag. I probably missed some, so feel free to chime in. Mastermind

You don't tug on Superman's cape, you don't spit into the wind...Or "So many A#$%oles, so few bullets"....

Here's an annoying phenomenon that I'm sure everyone who drives a musclecar has experienced. Everyone wants to race you or keep you from passing them. And I don't mean just other musclecars or sports cars, I mean EVERYONE. It's maddening because yes, when I was driving my Hurst / Olds, or my Trans-Am, or my 400 Powered Ventura, or my brother's GTO, etc I would gladly risk a big speeding ticket to put a "5.0" Mustang driver or Dodge Charger driver in their place. Ditto for those arrogant 'Vette drivers, and Nissan 350Z owners, Mazda RX-7 owners and especially 3 and 5 series BMW owners. I'd do it because it was fun, and it was fun because those people are used to winning 99% of the "Stoplight Gran Prix's" they initiate,and I got great joy seeing their eyes widen and jaws drop as I passed them. I have no problem with these people, because their cars are actually fast, and like me their just enjoying their car's performance whether they win or lose. The ones I hate are every thing else. Let me explain, and I'll even break them into groups. # 1. Import subcompact drivers. I'm not talking about Subaru WRX's, ( Which again-are actually freaking fast ). And spare me the "Fast&Furious" rap about 11 second Honda Civics and Nissan Sentras. I have never in my life run across one. But I have run across thousands of VW Jettas, Honda Civics, Nissan Sentras,and Toyota Corrolas with lowered suspensions, fat tires, and exhaust systems that sounds like a broken chainsaw. These people make New York Cab drivers look like safety instructors. They blast from light to light at full-throttle, and cut traffic mercilessly pissing everyone off in their wake. Except their cars aren't fast. One punk with a Honda Civic that worked at the Autozone store I worked at was always challenging my Hurst / Olds to a race. Until the night I blew his doors off in a drag race from a light in my wife's 318 Jeep Cherokee!!!  He was crushed when he reverently said "I had no Ideas those Jeeps were that fast." and I responded-"Sorry to burst your bubble Ringo-the Jeep isn't that fast-your econobox is slow." Another little asshole in my neighborhood drove a VW Corrado with a supercharged V6. Every day for like a month he'd have to blow by my H/O either on a city street or on the freeway and blow the horn and cut me off as he did it. Finally one day I pulled up next to him at a light that turned left and went onto the freeway. Once I stopped smoking my tires and got straight on the on-ramp I put the hammer down. 455 cubes responded and as I pulled even with him the TH400 laid about 30 feet of rubber into 2nd gear and I gave him the "finger" as I pulled away. I kept my foot in it until 5,700 rpm in high gear which with the 3.23 gears was something like 138 mph. Needless to say I smoked him by about 10 car lengths. Funny, every time I saw him after that he would drive like a little old lady or act like he didn't see me and turn right. Anyhow these little shits-( Their always males 18-25 years old ) are like flies that land on your face-they won't stop until you squash them. # 2. Penis Compensator Pickup and SUV drivers. These macho assholes are every bit as annoying as the little boys in the wanna-be rice rockets. No, their more annoying because the little boys will just drive away chagrined. Once in a while you'll have to get out and kick one of these guys asses after they "road rage" you and follow you where your going. These traffic bullies don't know physics. Their actually shocked when their 6,000 lb vehicle with 35" inch tires get's it's doors blown off by something with "less" power. The best one was the guy with the crew-cab SRT-10 Dodge Pickup. If you don't know Chrysler stuffed the 500 hp Viper motor into a few pickups a few years ago. He was utterly aghast when my brothers GTO showed him it's taillights. Hmm-you got 500 hp, but in a vehicle that weighs 5,700 lbs. My brother's GTO weighs 3731 lbs, and ( with the Edelbrock Performer RPM package-according to Edelbrock has 422 hp ). Guess what doofus-78 hp can't overcome an extra 2,000 lbs. My other personal favorite was the asshole with a monster F250 Ford Pickup that had a 460 with a tunnel-ram on it that both my 400 '72 Ventura and my buddys hopped up '83 Camaro sucked up and spit out in a 3-way drag race. "I've got ten grand in the motor of this thing!" he whined. Yeah but it weighs 6,400 lbs and has the aerodynamics of the Chrysler building!! Think that makes a difference.....# 3. Soccer moms in SUVs. V8 Cherokees,V8 Ford Explorers, V8 Toyota 4Runners, Turbo Subaru Foresters, Turbo Volvo XC90's, doesn't matter. Why I want to rape and kill these bitches and not in that order is while their going 70 on a city street where the speed limit is 35 to keep you from passing them or going over 100 on the freeway to keep you from getting over-they usually have two or three little kids strapped in child seats in the back seat!!!  If you blew a tire, or someone pulled in front of you at that speed, what's going to happen to your kids you dumb, miserable bitch??!!  # 4. German car owners. We all know BMW stands for "Break My Windows" right?  BMWs, Audis, Mercedes, VW's, they all drive like assholes and act like everyone else should get out of their way immediately, no matter what. Back in the '80's my cousin had a badass Camaro that had a vanity liscence plate that read 911 EATR. The hilarious thing was-once in a while we'd get in an impromptu drag race or game of cat and mouse on the freeway or a curvy road with a 911 driver, and win lose or draw, the 911 guys would usually laugh and gives us a thumbs up or ask us to pull over and shoot the breeze about cars or follow them to a sports bar for a beer. Typical gearheads. However, that plate mortally offended every other German car driver. He would be cut off, passed, blown the horn at and given the finger by every single asshole who drove a Mercedes, BMW, Audi, or VW. Their all dying off now, but I would go 10 miles out of my way to give the finger to a Mercedes or BMW driver with a "Holocaust Survivor" bumper sticker. You know what I'm talking about-if you accepted every challenge you get every day in your musclecar you'd lose your liscence in a month. But every once in a while, you have to smite one of these insects in biblical fashion because they so richly deserve it. Just had to vent that. Mastermind                    

Hey Hollywood.....I'm available as a consultant....And desperately needed!!!

Musclecars are often featured in movies and T.V. shows, but Hollywood incessantly screws up when referring to them. Maybe for someone who knows nothing about cars it's not a big deal but for us gear heads it's maddening. Here's a few glaring gaffes that I found just this week on cable tv. # 1. "The Butcher". This made for cable action flick stars Eric Roberts as an ex-boxer turned mob enforcer who has to defend himself against the cops and other gangsters when he's wrongly blamed for robbing and killing a rival mob boss. The story and the action are ok, and everyone wants to buy his 1969 Dodge Charger. Except it's a '73 model!!!!  Yet, everyone in the film, including Roberts, says it's a '69!!  And several people say it's a 4-speed, yet when he's driving it, you clearly see an automatic column shifter!!  Arrrrggghhhh!!!!  # 2. "Love Ranch" This flick stars Joe Pesci and Helen Mirren and it's thinly veiled as "not" the story of boxer Oscar Bonavena's murder at the Mustang Ranch brothel outside Reno. They say it's 1976 at the beginning of the film ( which is when it really happened ). What drove me up the wall was they had the boxer driving a 1979 Trans-Am!!  Why? For god's sake they couldn't find a '75 or '76 model?  # 3. "Cold Case". This episode was about the 1972 murder of a teenage boy. On his bedroom wall was poster of a barefoot Farrah Fawcett-Majors sitting on the hood of a white and blue Mustang II, and the famous wet-t-shirt poster of Jacqueline Bisset from "The Deep". Both of them are completely wrong. Here's why. The one with Farrah is obviously a promo shot for "Charlie's Angels". I know because I had the same poster when I was in high school. Except Ford didn't introduce the Mustang II until 1974, and "Charlie's Angels" premiered in September 1976!!!  The "Deep" poster with Bisset wearing only bikini panties, a wet-t-shirt which clung to her awesome rack and showed her large nipples, and a scuba mask was also a best seller. Except the movie and the poster were released in 1977!!!  So how did this kid have them in 1972???  Ugh.  #4 "Vegas". This only lasted one season, probably because it was such a major offender. It starred Dennis Quaid as real-life sherriff Ralph Lamb,Michael Chiklis as a Chicago Gangster who owns a casino and Carrie-Anne Moss as the District Attorney. However, the series was set in 1960. Yet Moss drove a '63 T-Bird, Chiklis drove a '62 Continental with the Suicide Doors, and Quaid drove a 1964 Dodge pickup!!!  # 5. "The Dark Half". This Stephen King thriller pissed me off as both a book and a movie. The Killer drove a 1966 Toronado which is a cool enough ride,but in both the book and the movie they refer to him spinning the rear wheels!! How, when Toronados are all FRONT-WHEEL DRIVE!!!  And in the book they talk about him having a Hurst-shifted 4-speed in it!!! Except all Toronados are automatics!!  They should have had him driving a '60's Pontiac Gran Prix-which is rear-wheel drive,had a lot of power with 389,400,421 or 428 cubes under the hood, and was available with a 4-speed stick. # 6. "White Lightning". This is one of my favorite action flicks and one of Burt Reynolds best. Except when he gets the car from the feds and they show him the engine-He says "Looks like a 429 with dual quads..."  Except you clearly see one Holley 4-barrel under a Weiand Lynx air cleaner. And in some scenes it's a 4-speed-they show the Hurst shifter and him shifting it. In others it's an automatic-you see him put it in park in one scene, and in another Jennifer Billingsley slams it into drive and takes off. Nit-picky, I know, but still.... # 7. "Smokey and the Bandit". Another Burt Reynolds classic with the same problem. In some scenes the T/A is a 4-speed, you see the clutch pedal and him shifting it. In others you see the automatic shifter next to the CB radio on the console. Rumor has it that Sally Field couldn't drive a stick, and that Burt and director Hal Needham just gave up trying to edit it, figuring no one would notice. Well we did. Why doesn't Hollywood hire someone who knows cars to help edit this stuff??  Mastermind                      

"X" might just mark the spot.....

If your looking for a cheap hot rod one that's often overlooked are the GM "X" bodies. I know '68-72 Novas have a "cult" following, but the others are largely overlooked. 1971-77 Pontiac Venturas, 1973-79 Olds Omegas and Buick Apollos can be bought dirt cheap. What makes them a great base for a street machine is the subframe and suspensions are the same as the "F" bodies. That means any factory or aftermarket suspension or brake upgrades that fit a Camaro / Firebird will fit these cars. You can build a "G" machine that corners like a Trans-Am or a Corvette, or a drag racer that will pull the front wheels on launch. The other great thing is the engine bays will accept any GM engine. The Pontiacs are the king sleepers-Pontiac engines are externally identical from a 326 to a 455. That means a 400 or 455 will literally bolt in place of the 350. And a Ventura weighs about 600 lbs less than a Firebird / Trans-Am. If you want to stay brand loyal-a 455 Buick Apollo or a 455 Olds Omega would be a rocker. Or you could swap a small or big block Chevy into any of them, or a late-model LS motor. They have a ton of potential for very low bucks. I took the warmed-over 400 out of my '78 Trans-Am that I wrecked and put it a '72 Ventura back in the '80's. I smoked quite a few people who thought they were messing with a small-block Nova. And I had like $1,500 bucks in the whole car. A "X" body might be just the ticket for high performance for low bucks.  Mastermind  

"I like it, I love it, I want some more of it".....

      Country singer Tim McGraw was talking about sex with a new girlfriend, but I think it applies to a new batch of cars. Dodge is releasing the Hellcat Challenger that has a superhcarged Hemi with 707 hp!!  Chevy has put the 638 hp ZR1 'Vette motor in the Camaro. I was at a Ford dealer the other day and saw a Roush Mustang with a blown 5.0 with 600+ hp. Old-school guys-Listen up-even if your allowed slicks and open headers-these cars will eat the lunch of your LS6 Chevelle or Hemi 'Cuda, or L88 'Vette on street tires. Give the new ones drag radials-and it's not even close. That may be a bitter pill for some to swallow-but it's evolution. The small-block Chevy replaced the flathead Ford as "The" hotrod engine. Deride the new cars if you want-but except for electronic fuel management and ignition timing-it's still old-school hot-rodding. 11:1 compression, more cubes, more cam,putting a big motor in a light car, etc. And it's not only middle-aged rich guys who can afford a $60,000-100,000 car that can play. For 24K you can buy a Ford Mustang with a 305 hp V6 that does the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Ditto for a 323hp Camaro. For $27K you can buy a Subaru WRX that does the 1/4 in 13.8 seconds. A Nissan 370Z offers similar performance with it's 332hp V6 for 29K. In my mind-this is the golden age of automotive performance.  Like I've said-I'm a Pontiac guy-I'd love to buy a '78 400, 4-speed WS6 T/A to play with, or a '72 Ventura or a '69 Gran Prix. But I'd also like to have a new Mustang, or an '80's Porsche 944 or a '70's Datsun 240Z. Like Vin Diesel said-"I appreciate a fine body no matter who makes it."  Embrace these new monsters, and buy them if you can!! Keep the flame burning!  Mastermind    

Trans-Ams in movies......Besides "Smokey and the Bandit:......

After the last post espousing the Trans-Am's importance to musclecar history and survival some people asked if T/A's were featured in other movies either with or without car-chase action. Here's the list of some I remember. # 1. "McQ". John Wayne was offered "Dirty Harry" and turned it down. After it made Clint Eastwood a mega-star-( Clint was well known for the "Spaghetti Westerns" of Sergio Leone-"A Fistful of Dollars" "For a Few Dollars More" and "The Good, the Bad and The Ugly", but "Dirty Harry" really put him on the map ) he realized his mistake and decided to make a modern Cop drama. It actually had a good story about corrupt cops in Seattle and no one plays a tough guy like the Duke,but it was released at the same time as "Magnum Force"-with Clint as Dirty Harry battling corrupt cops in San Francisco. "Magnum Force" was a Mega-hit, and "McQ" got critical acclaim but didn't do much box office. It's still a good action flick and John Wayne drove a Brewster Green 1973 Trans-Am. # 2. "Thunderbolt&Lightfoot." This one featured Clint Eastwood as a Master Thief and Jeff Bridges as his younger protege'. Early on Bridges steals a white '73 T/A. Later him and Clint dump it and steal a '73 "Boat Tail" Riviera. Not one of Clint's better pics-the story dragged and was too convoluted to make sense of.  # 3 "The Star Chamber" featured Micheal Douglas as an Idealistic Judge who's seen too many murdering dirtbags go free on technicalities. His pal Hal Holbrook initiates him into a secret panel of Judges that vote and mete out the death penalty to killers who have gotten off via their personal hitman. There's a cool chase in a parking garage and the bad guys do the most awesome burnout you'll ever see on screen in a 455 powered '73 T/A.  # 4. "An Eye for an Eye". Chuck Norris Martial-Arts thriller filmed in San Francisco. Chuck kicks a lot of ass and drives a Buccaneer Red '73 T/A, but sadly no car-chase action. Chuck had a good chase in "Code of Silence" driving a beater '75 Formula 400 if your interested. # 5 "The Hunter". Steve McQueen's last movie-with the King of Cool playing real-life Bounty Hunter Ralph "Papa" Thorson. He steals a black and gold '79 T/A that gets blown up after a little chase. # 6. "Georgia Peaches". This was a CBS made for TV action flick. It's notable for some good car chase action in a '79 10th Anniversary T/A, ( Which gets blown up ) and a young Tanya Tucker has a cool bondage scene. ( Not quite as cool as Maureen McCormick's ( Marcia Brady!! ) in "Moonshine County Express" but still sexy. ) ( Call me a perv if you want-you same people who wore out your "pause" and re-wind" buttons going slo-mo on Jennifer Billingsley's VERY dirty bare feet in her scene teasing Burt Reynolds by the river. Just shut up and rent the flicks. )  # 7. "Blue Thunder" Action Thriller with Roy Schieder as a Viet Nam Vet turned Police Helicopter pilot who steals an experimental attack chopper from the Army and uncovers a conspiracy and several murders. He drives a Black and Gold T/A that in some scenes is a '79 with a "Shaker" hood and in others is an '81 Turbo Model. The only chase involves Candy Clark eluding the bad guys and the cops in a Vega while Scheider smites them from the air. ( It actually works on screen ). # 8 "Hooper" This comedy starred Burt Reynolds and Jan-Michael Vincent as rival stuntmen. In their movie within the movie they do a bunch of stunts in a rocket-powered red '78 T/A.  I'm sure there's more I missed, so feel free to write in and tell us about them. Mastermind      

The most important musclecar...

Musclecar Review asked readers to write in about what they thought was the the most important musclecar of the last 50 years. Here's what I wrote. The Pontiac Trans-Am is the most important musclecar of the last 50 years. People will argue Hemi 'Cudas, LS6 Chevelles, Boss 429s, blah,blah,blah. Think back to 1974 at the height of the Arab oil embargo. By 1975 the Charger, Road Runner,'Cuda and Challenger were no more. The Javelin AMX was no more. There were no more SS Chevelles, the Z/28 was no more,and the largest engine you could get in a Corvette was a 350, and you couldn't even get a 4-speed in California. The Mustang was more Pinto / Capri than Mustang. Yet you could still get a 455 in a Trans-Am until 1976 and a 400 was available until 1979. Gee, why did T/A sales double or triple every year after 1973? Musclecar buyers didn't go away, the carmakers stopped making cars that they wanted to buy. T/A sales went from 4,800 in 1973 to 10,000 in 1974, to 23,000 in 1975 to 46,000 in 1976 and to 68,000 in 1977.  After "Smokey and the Bandit" 1978 sales went to 93,000 and 1979 sales to 117,000. Chevy realized their mistake and resurrected the Z/28 in April 1977 and '78 was a record year. But he bottom line was-if you wanted a badass musclecar in the late '70's you had one choice-a Trans-Am. Scoff at their 6 second 0-60 times and 15 second 1/4 miles. Yes I know a V6 Toyota Camry can do that now. But in the darkest days when catalytic converters were new-they were the fastest cars available. The T/A like Buford Pusser standing up to corruption in the South, stood Janus-faced against all comers while Motor Trend and Car and Driver were espousing front-drive econoboxes-Patrick Bedard won't admit it now- but he actually raved about the Chevy Citation in 1980. If it wasn't for the Trans-Am we would'nt have had "5.0" Mustangs in the '80's, Buick Gran Nationals, or LT1 or LS1 'Vettes and Camaros or Impala SS's in the '90's. And we wouldn't have 400 hp Mustangs, Challengers and Camaros now. Next time you turn on TNT thank Burt Reynolds and Pontiac for keeping the faith and bridging the gap between the '60's and the '80's. Otherwise-like the "Cat in the Hat" Movie we'd all be driving Focuses.  Mastermind  

"Cold" August Nights......

Hot August Nights is here again and every year I get more disappointed. Maybe it's the economy and people aren't traveling from as far away anymore,or Maybe it's the city of Reno being assholes-Like the Highway Patrol writing tickets on I-80 between VerdI and Reno as you come into town. Yeah,a $200 ticket before I even get into town will make me want to come back!! And the greedy motel and casino owners raising the room prices from the-rest-of-the-year $39-$89 a night to $100-$200 a night during HAN. Yeah, that puts a good taste into people's mouth. And because some Bay Area gang-bangers started a riot 15 years ago, the Police just HAVE to restrict alchohol sales downtown and not allow cruising. And while Vegas has people like Celine Dion and Elton John and Shania Twain and Britney Spears and Toby Keith Headlining at their casinos we get Frankie Avalon and Fabian and the Beach Boys. The "I can't believe I'm not dead tour". Not Faith Hill or Beyonce' or Keith Urban, or even Jerry Lee Lewis or Eric Burdon or John Fogerty or John Kay of Steppenwolf-you know people that actually have hits on MTV and the radio now, or at least had them in the musclecar era and the last 40 years that people actually want to see!! And besides that-I don't care what the organizers say attendance is WAY down from the past few years. I can tell because you don't see any cars anymore. A few years ago-the town looked like it was transported back to 1970. There was '50's and '60s cars all over the streets. Now once in a while you'll see a classic driving around. And the "Show-n-Shines" suck too. Used to you'd see all kinds of cool stuff-Cobras,Plymouth Superbirds,Thunderbolt Fairlanes,W31`Cutlasses,428 Mustangs, 455 Trans-Ams, 396 Novas etc. Now it's cookie cutter the Chevy section is all '55-57s, and 68-72 Chevelles and 67-69 Camaros. You never see a '57 Vette, or a '63 Split Window Stingray or '69 427 Stingray-you hardly see any 'Vettes at all. And no 409 Impalas or 427 Impalas,no Nova SS's no '70's Camaros, no V8 Vegas, No Chevelles or Impalas done in "Gasser" style-radiused wheel wells, straight front axles etc. Ditto for the other makes. The Ford section is all Mustang. Very few if any Torinos,Cougars,Cyclones,Rancheros,T-Birds. Hell I'd rejoice if I saw a hot-rod Falcon!!  Same for Mopar. It's all 68-70 Chargers and Road Runners and a few '70-74 E-bodies-'Cudas and Challengers. No early '60's Max Wedge cars,no Hemi Darts,no Superbirds,no Sport Furys, no Super Bees, again-I'd cheer if I even saw a nice 340 Duster or Dodge Demon!!  It's just sad, because I remember when it was fun. And 1/8 mile drag races in parking lots?  Puhleeze. Come on you cheap bastard Casino owners pay the extra insurance premium and have real 1/4 mile races at Reno-Fernley Raceway or at the Stead Airport like they used to. An 1/8 mile elinimates all the big-block cars from winning. You know that-how many times have you had some punk in a 302 Mustang or 350 Camaro or 340 Duster jump you off the line and then about 60 mph-your 440 Road Runner, 396 Chevelle or 400 Firebird in a beautiful display of mid-range torque-catches and passes him while you giggle like a fiend. An 1/8 mile-if they'd let me enter it-I could dominate in my Subaru!!  Sorry just had to vent that. Maybe the orgainizers will wake up and stop killing the Golden Goose. Mastermind  

Still more cool one or two year wonders.....

For whatever reason-poor sales, bodystyle changes,smog laws whatever-some really cool stuff only lasted a couple years. But on the upside not many people know about them, so sometimes you can get a real bargain on a unique car. Here's some cool rides, mostly later model stuff but still fun. I've listed them in no particular order. #1. 1975 Plymouth Road Runner. For this one year only Chrysler put the Road Runner nameplate on the Sport Fury platform. They had a "Tuff" steering wheel, bucket seats, special badging and the famous "Beep-Beep" horn. 318 versions are dogs, but the 360 and 400 models can be made to run strong. Roughly 6,500 were built so you should be able to find one. # 2. 1977 Pontiac Can-Am. Wanting to capitalize on the Trans-Am's skyrocketing sales and image the engineers came up with this performance package based on the LeMans body. Appearance items included a special white paint job with "Judge" style striping,a ducktail rear spoiler,a Trans-Am style "Shaker" hood scoop,body-colored Rally II wheels and a Gran Prix instrument panel. Performance items included front and rear sway bars, a 400 Pontiac V8 ( 403 Olds in California ) a TH400 with a shift kit, and a positraction rear end. The "A" bodies were all downsized for 1978 so it only lasted one season. Cool if you can find one. # 3. 1983-86 Mercury Capri. That's not a typo. Most people hear "Capri" and think of the 4-banger / V6 econoboxes of the '70's. For these few years you got a 302 V8 with  real tube headers,a 600 Holley on an aluminum manifold,a five-speed stick or a 4-speed automatic and sport suspension-basically a re-badged "5.0" Mustang. Obviously anything that fits a Fox 'Stang will fit these cars so there's tons of potential. I'd remove the "5.0" emblems to make it a real sleeper. # 4. 1984-86 Ford Mustang SVO. These had Recaro seats,16" wheels and tires,sport suspension and a Turbocharged 4-cylinder engine that made between 175 and 205 hp depending on year. They didn't sell well because the "5.0" V8 models were both faster and several thousand dollars cheaper. However you can buy them fairly cheap today,and the 2.3 Ford is virtually bulletproof-you could turn the boost way up and get more power without ill effects. # 5. 1984 Chevrolet Corvette. This was the first year of the C4 body that lasted until 1996. Power is a "Cross-Fire" injected 350 backed by a 4-speed automatic, or a 4-speed manual with an overdrive-the "4+3"-you can engage the overdrive in 2nd,3rd or 4th effectively giving you 7 gears. 'Vette collectors snub these cars in favor of the '85-91 "Tuned Port" injected models which keeps prices low. My brother in-law bought a rough-but running one for $1,200 and I've seen nice ones on used car lots for $2995!!  There is more speed equipment for a small-block Chevy than anything else on the planet so ramping up performance should be easy. # 6. 1989 20th Anniversary Trans-Am. These cars had a special white and blue paint job,Recaro seats,WS6 suspension and the nasty Turbocharged V6 out of the Buick Grand National. The Turbo GN motor not only had more power than the LB9 and L98 small-block Chevy V8s, it was a couple hundred pounds lighter. So these cars were not only faster than a regular T/A, they handled noticeably better too. Dynamite if you can find one. # 7. 2003-2004 Mercury Marauder. These were based on the Marquis / Crown Vic platform. You got Police Interceptor suspension,fat 18" tires and wheels,a monochromatic paint job,and a snarling 302 hp V8 pirated out of the Mustang Cobra backed by a 4-speed automatic with a special high-stall torque converter. Inside were special seats and Auto Meter guages. Ford never promoted these cars,and never had the buff magazines test one, and then wondered why they didn't sell. Jennifer Garner drove one on "Alias" in a decent car chase, but even that didn't help. Cool if you can find one. # 8. 2004-2006 Pontiac GTO. The best car nobody bought. These had either a 350hp 5.7 V8 ( 2004 ) or a 400 hp 6.0 V8 pirated straight out of the Corvette backed by a six-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic. Car and Driver summed it up perfectly "It runs like a Corvette, handles like a BMW and looks like a Rental Car." The bland styling is why they didn't sell. If Pontiac had done what Ford did with the Mustang and what Dodge did with the Challenger-go retro '60s or '70's style-they'd have sold like hot cakes. The upside is Cops won't notice you unless your being really obnoxious. I've seen these on used car lots for as low as 8K so they are a bargain if you want one. Mastermind          

Some more cool one or two year models........

Here's some more one or two year models that you can still gt a bargain on.  # 1. 1967 Pontiac GTO. For some reason everyone wants a '64-66 model, or a '68-72 model. These are overlooked and I don't know why. They have the best of both worlds. The bodystyle is very similar to the '66, yet they have many cool features that the later models had. For example if you get an automatic in a '64-66 model it's a 2-speed ST300 ( read BOP bolt-pattern Powerglide ). The '67 models had the excellent 3-speed TH400. The new 400 inch V8 had much better breathing cylinder heads than the '66 and earlier 389. Front disc brakes were an option for the first time. 81,000 were built, so you ought to be able to find one for a decent price. # 2. 1971 Dodge Super Bee. For this one year only the Super Bee was based on the Charger body instead of the Coronet. Hemi and 440 Six-pack versions are priced in the startosphere, but you can still get a good deal on 383 models. 6,500 or so were built so their not a moon rock.  # 3. 1973 Chevrolet Corvette. For this one year only you got the ducktail rear end of the '68-72 models and the urethane front bumper of the '74-79 models. The L48 and L82 350 V8s were rated at 190 and 250 hp respectively, and the LS4 454 was rated at 275 hp. For some reason 'Vette collectors snub these cars in favor of the earlier or later models-but I think their cool and that keeps prices reasonable. And the catalyst-free dual exhausts make them much more powerful than the later ones. # 4. 1974 Pontiac GTO. Often called the "Best Nova ever Built." This was the year that Pontiac switched the GTO nameplate from the "A" body LeMans chassis to the "X" body ( read Nova ) platform. The buff magazines howled to the high heavens and derided the car which probably hurt sales. The Trans-Am was now the flagship, and the engineers were trying to jump-start sales with a new, fresh package. The buff magazines were wrong-it was a good performance package-they had wrist-thick front and rear sway bars,a Trans-Am style shaker hood scoop,front disc brakes, and a 350 V8 backed by a 4-speed or a TH350. They were good performers for the time-15 second 1/4 mile times. 7,058 were sold-and think about this-a 400 or a 455 is a bolt-in swap, and a Ventura weighs about 3,200 lbs-600 lbs less than a same-year Firebird, and any suspension or brake upgrades that fit a Camaro / Firebird fit these cars. A dynamite sleeper if you can find one. #5. 1977-78 AMC AMX. AMC tried to resurrect the AMX nameplate on the compact Hornet chassis. They actually gave it some cool graphics and a great handling suspension. The bummer was the biggest engine available was a 304 V8 with a 2bbl that wheezed out 120 hp. The upside is AMC V8's are like Pontiacs-they are externally identical from a 290 to a 401. So a stompin' 360 or 401 would be a bolt-in swap. With a curb weight of 2,900 lbs-a 360 or 401 in one of these would give those smug disco-era T/A owners ( and some 5.0 Mustang and other musclecar owners for that matter ) a surprise they'd never forget. Maybe one of these can be your dream ride....Mastermind    

Some one or two year "less than premium" models that can be cool and unique...

Every manufacturer had some "budget" hot rods that were pretty cool and priced less than the top of the line models. These can be fun rides not- "cookie-cutter" rods that you see at every "Show-n-Shine" every weekend. Here's some of my personal favorites in no particular order. # 1. 1970-71 Pontiac Tempest T37, 1972 LeMans GT.  The buff magazines called these the "Poor Man's GTO". You got a 2 door Tempest coupe with a 350 V8 and a 3-speed stick, although you could also get a 4-speed or an automatic, and a 400 or a 455. In 1972 the "T37" moniker was dropped, but the "LeMans GT" was the same basic package. Cool because their NOT a GTO that someone gussied up like a Judge.  #2. 1971-72 "Heavy Chevy". These were a 2 dr Malibu with an SS style domed hood,a blacked out grille, hood pins,slotted 14" Rally Wheels and "Heavy Chevy" badging. Most have 350 small-block motivation which certainly isn't a bad thing, and some have 402 Rat motors. 6,727 were built in '71 and another 3,000 or so in '72, so their not a moon rock. I wouldn't pay "SS" money for one-but they are cooler than a garden-variety Malibu. #3. 1971-72 "Rally Nova". These were a 2 dr Nova with slotted 14" Rally Wheels, a blacked out grille, and a Black Stripe down the side that said- duh-"Rally Nova". Most have the ubuiquitous 350 for power. I personally think they have cleaner styling than the SS model-with it's fake hood scoops and side louvers.  # 4. 1971-72 Satellite Sebring. These look just like a Road Runner, and a lot of them have 383 or 400 cubes under the hood. 318 models are dirt cheap, and you could swap in a stompin' 360 or 360 based stroker pretty easily. # 5. 1971-72 Dodge Demon. These were the Dodge Boys response to the 340 Duster that was wildly successful in 1970. Besides the potent 340 V8, these cool rides had a scooped hood, a Go-Wing spoiler, special stripes, and cool little "Demon" holding a Pitchfork emblems. Even in the '70's Political correctness ruined things. A bunch of Christian groups complained and Chrysler caved in to the pressure, so the "Demon" moniker was dropped and the name changed to "Dart Sport" for 1973. Much Cooler than a Duster in my book. Mr Norm's Grand Spaulding Dodge even put Paxton Superchargers on a few and called them "Demon GSS". # 6. 1972-73 Mercury Montego GT. David Pearson had great success in NASCAR in one of these fastback coupes. I think their better looking than their more sought after Torino cousins. Most will have 351C power which is if anything, a plus factor. A few were built with 429s, but they may be pricey-and Ironically-the 351C was rated at 266 hp and the 429 was only rated at 205. I'd paint one like the Pearson's "Wood Brothers" racer-ala-Popular Hot Rodding's "Project Talledega".  All of these cars offer a lot of bang for the buck and are something you don't see everyday.  Mastermind    

Base models and different model years can be big fun for low bucks.......

I get a lot of mail from people lamenting how they can't afford their dream car. And I'm not talking about Hemi 'Cudas or LS6 Chevelles. Even 396 Chevelles or 383 Road Runners will bring 40 grand if their nicely restored and people want 15 grand for stuff that needs 20 grand worth of work. However-you can still find screaming deals if you look in the right place. For example-if your a Mopar fan even 340 Dusters are getting pricey. But you can still buy a 318 powered 2 door Duster or Dart dirt cheap. Mopar performance and Blueprint engines sell 400 hp 360 crate engines-which would be a bolt-in swap. ( You'd have to get a small-block bolt-pattern 727 Torqueflite; a 904 won't stand up to that kind of power-but B&M and TCI can hook you up. ) If the car was a three-speed stick-I'd swap it for a 4-speed. Yes, people want between 50 and 100 grand for a '69-70 Boss 302 Mustang or a 428 Mach 1.  However, Ford built over 70,000 fastback Mustangs in 1969 alone, and most of them have 351W power. I have seen these in great condition for 12-20K. Ford SVT sells stompin' 351W crate motors-you could keep the numbers-matching one in your garage in case you ever want to sell the car. Yes, 455HO and SD Trans-Ams bring 50 grand all day-but I saw a 1978 WS6, 400, 4-speed T/A with 44,000 original miles for $19,900 on the Trans-Am Specialties website!! I saw a 1979 WS6,400, 4-speed, 10th Anniversary model with 66,000 original miles for $14,900!!!  Chevrolet only built 58,000 SS396's in 1968-but they built over 400,000 Malibus that same year. Buy a 2 door Malibu and slap a GMPP 454 or 502 crate engine in it and rock-n-roll!!  Think outside the box a little and you may find a gem you love for a low price. Mastermind

Special Editions that aren't really Special.....But you may be able to buy reasonably....

There's a lot of cars out there that people advertise as rare, special editions. Their nice, and they have cool features-but their not ultra rare or ultra valuable. For example-in 1967-68 you could buy a Mustang coupe with Shelby-style side scoops and T-Bird taillights. Most had 289 motivation, but a few had 390s. Most are called "California Specials" because the majority of them were sold in Duh-California. There are a few called "High Country Specials" that are the same package that was sold in the Denver, Colorado area. I think four or five thousand were built. I would pay more for one of these than I would for a garden-variety Mustang coupe, but they aren't worth Shelby GT350 money-which sellers will try to get. In fact-you could buy a generic Mustang and add the taillights and scoops yourself if you really dig the look. Here's some others to look for. # 2. 1970 Olds Cutlass Rallye 350. These cars had a super loud Sebring Yellow paint job,body-colored bumpers, and "Judge" type rear spoiler. The engine was a 350 V8 rated at 310 hp backed by a 4-speed or a TH350. 3,527 were built. Rumors persist thst 10 or 12 got the vaunted "W31" 350, but I have never seen a build sheet or window sticker for one. Again-people will try to get 442 or Hurst / Olds money-but other than the paint job-their just a 350 Cutlass coupe. # 3. 1977 Trans-Am SE. Of the 68,000 or so T/A's sold in 1977 over 15,000 were black and gold SE's. Other than the striping and the gold dash panel-their just a garden variety T/A. Because of "Smokey and the Bandit" even more were sold in '78-79. # 4. 1978 Silver Anniversary Corvette. All 1978 Corvettes had the 50th Anniversary badging, and nearly 10,000 had the two-tone silver / charcoal grey paint job. An L82 4-speed might be worth a few extra bucks, but other wise their a garden-variety Corvette. All these cars are cool if you can get a deal on one, but don't pay extra for one. Mastermind  

Some '70's cars that could be great sleepers.......

For those on a tight budget often you have to think outside the box to find a cool ride at a decent price. Here's some that most people don't think of that offer a lot of bang for the buck.  #1. 1969-76 Pontiac Gran Prix. 400 V8 power standard all years, and a fair number of '70-76 "SJ" models have 455s! My sister had a '72 GP in high school and she showed her taillights to quite a few Camaros and Mustangs. Any suspension or brake upgrades that fit all GM "A" bodies ( i.e.-Chevelle, LeMans, Cutlass, Monte Carlo ) will fit these cars. Dynamite. # 2. 1975-78 Plymouth Sport Fury. Remember the "Blues Brothers?" "Its got Cop tires, Cop shocks...."  Seriously-the 2 dr models are actually pretty good looking, and a lot of them have 400 or 440 cubes under the hood.  # 3. 1977-79 Pontiac Catalina / Bonneville. 1977 was the year all the "big" GM cars were downsized and they weigh about 700 lbs less than the 1976 and earlier models. While the Caprice/Impala line was limited to a 350 small-block,most of the Pontiacs had either a 400 Pontiac V8 or a 403 Olds V8 for motivation. The 2dr models are actually kind of racy looking, and since they were the top of the line, they usually have cool options like power windows and seats,cruise control, etc. # 4. 1978-79 Chevy Malibu,Monte Carlo and El Camino. In 1978 GM downsized all the mid-sizes,and changed the coding from "A" body to "G" body. The newer cars were 600 lbs lighter than the '77 and earlier models. 1980 and later models were limited to 305 cubes, but in '78 and '79 you could still get a 350 with a 4bbl! There's more speed parts for a small-block Chevy than anything else on the planet-so these cars can be made to really run relatively cheap. # 5. 1977-79 Ford Ranchero. These were based on the LTD II platform instead of the Fairlane / Torino chassis that the '68-76 models were based on. They had a roomier and more luxurious interior which makes them nice drivers, and a lot of them had 400 or 460 cubes under that long hood. Cool if you can find one.  Mastermind

The hottest women in Car-Chase Movies....Redux by requests........

About a year ago I ran a post about the hottest women in car chase movies. It was popular and got a lot of good-natured debate going. Recently I had a few requests to re-run it-especially since F&F 7 is coming out-shot around Paul Walker's death and since they killed Gal Gadot and Gina Carano in "F&F" 6,- People have asked me to do it again and I aim to please-so here's my rankings of the hottest women in Muslcecar / Car Chase movies.  # 1. Jennifer Billingsley "White Lightning". With her dark-brown roots showing in her bleach-blonde hair, barefoot in that tight, flowery mini-sundress almost the whole movie, "Shake a Puddin" just oozed sex. When she runs her bare foot up and down his biceps in the front seat of his famous brown LTD and tells Burt Reynolds-"Gator if you want it, just ask." "If you don't that's ok too." I about shit. Burt replies-"What about Roy?" ( Bo Hopkins-her evil moonshiner boyfriend ) She says-"He's not gonna be standing there watching us is he?" "I hope not." Gator says. Later, she has sex with Burt in the river-while Bo Hopkins sleeps in the house up the road. When Burt sets her up for rape so they can escape Big Bear and Sheriif Connors henchman-she doesn't even hold it against him. They kick ass and she drives Burt to a home for unwed mothers for medical attention for his gunshot wounds. She epitomized the southern slut that men die and kill for. Others have tried to do it-Kim Basinger in "No Mercy", Teri Hatcher in "Heaven's Prisoners" and most recently Reese Witherspoon in "Mud"-but none have ever been able to top "Shake a Puddin."  #2. Darlanne Fluegel  "To Live and Die in L.A." This under-rated thriller was directed by William Freidkin ( "The French Connection" "The Exorcist") and starred a young, pre-"CSI" William Peterson as a Secret Service agent after a young Willem Dafoe, who was a master counterfieter that killed Peterson's partner. A classically trained stage actress who'd been wasted in Horror-"Eyes of Laura Mars" and Sci-Fi-"Battlestar Galactica"-she got to show her chops here as Ruth-"Chance's" informant / hooker / girlfriend. And she was naked a lot. When she asks him what would you do if I stopped feeding you information? and he replies "I'd violate your parole and send you back to prison" You know she's going to set him up. And she does. What was great about her performance was she wasn't the cliche' hard-luck girl with a heart of gold. She's a bitch and a whore and she uses men to get what she wants and doesn't care; she knows it and we know it, that makes it unanimous. # 3. Jacqueline Bisset "Bullitt". At 33, in 1977, millions of teenage boys thought she was so smokin hot in bikini panties and a wet-t-shirt that the "Deep" poster outsold everything, inclucing Farrah Fawcett in the red bathing suit that was the 1976 champ. You need to watch "Bullitt" and catch her at 24. The british accent, naked and barefoot under Steve McQueen's wrinkled shirt, offering him breakfast-Like Waynes world-"Schwing!" Only her vomiting after seeing a corpse and reading Steve off for being jaded kept her out of the top spots. # 4. Susan George "Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry", "A Small Town in Texas." I upped her ranking because she's in not one, but two cult classics. Three, actually if you count "Mandingo" where her sexy inter-racial love scenes with Boxer Ken Norton got her some Sharon Stone style "Basic Instinct" noteriety for a few years.  "Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry" actually had a good story about a kidnapping / robbery gone wrong and some good automotive action. She's largely wasted as Peter Fonda and his co-hort make fun of her for most of the film. However she gets honorable mention for spending the whole picture barefoot in hip-hugger jeans and a straining denim halter top. She plays basically the same character-an ignorant slut-as Dan Ackroyd would say- in "A Small Town in Texas". Her football hero boyfriend gets railroaded to prison by the corrupt sheriff on drug charges. So while he's serving time,she of course has no choice but to start sleeping with the sheriff!! Then he comes home, and as they said in Johnny Dangerously-it's Fargin War. Good action and a fight to the finish finale. #5 Isabelle Adjani "The Driver" Adjani is great at playing tortured chanteuses-she stole "Diabolique" from Sharon Stone. As getaway driver Ryan O'Neal's contact and sometime lover-it's her murder that sends him on a path of vengenance and sets up the films excellent final hour. # 6. I'll have to go on the 'net and get her name-but the naked motorcycle rider from "Vanishing Point" has got to be on the list. I loved the '70's. This was before political correctness, and before "PG13" ratings. When I say naked-I don't mean tasteful camera angles, back shots, I mean totally nude and barefoot, full-frontal tit and bush shots and I mean long, lingering shots-not like "Playboy" videos where you think the camera is mounted on an Indy car circling the model!! When Kowalski declines both a joint and sex-she just gets back on the bike and conintues riding! So bad.  #7. Lynda Carter "Bobbi Jo and The Outlaw." She actually made this before she got the "Wonder Woman" gig-but it was released after. It's main attribute is she gets naked a lot. Evangelist turned action star Marjoe Gortner was sexy and menacing as her car-thief boyfriend who kills someone in self-defense, causing them to go on the run. Some decent car-chase action in a Mustang and other cars that Gortner steals. Did I mention that Lynda gets naked a lot?  There's going to be some griping about a few omissions-but I don't care. Sally Field in "Smokey and the Bandit?" Sorry. Can't get a woodie for the "Flying Nun" in a Trans-Am. Jordana Brewster spent all her time in the F&F movies mediating the "Bromance" fights between Paul Walker and Vin Diesel. No sex, and not even a gratuitous bikini scene when they went to Brazil ( Gal Gadot provided that ). The smokin hot Eva Mendes spent about 30 seconds in a bikini in F&F 2, but that doesn't count in my book. Any how let the Ginger vs Mary Ann type debates begin....Mastermind              

Get off this "Brand Loyalty" of "This rules and everything else sucks......You might be pleasantly surprised!!!

I've said it before and I'll say it again-If I see one more Dodge Pickup with "Calvin"-( of the Comic strip " Calvin&Hobbes" ) pissing on a Chevy Bow-Tie emblem or a Camaro with a "Friends don't let friends drive Fords" bumper sticker, I'm going to ram the driver with my old Buick. My dad was a Pontiac guy and so am I. Yes,- If I had an unlimited bankroll-I'd have a Ram Air IV Judge or an SD-455 Trans-Am. In reality-I'll probably buy another Disco-era T/A ( '77-79 ) and put Edelbrock heads and other goodies on it that's more in line with my current finances. Or maybe buy a '69-77 Gran Prix or a '71-74 Ventura and play with that. But I'm not limited to Pontiacs. I'd love to have a '67-68 Cougar. I think that's one of the coolest cars Ford ever put out. Or a '71-73 Mustang Mach 1. Buddies of mine had those in high school and I have fond memeories of them both. I'd also love to have a '70 "Vanishing Point" Challenger. I can't afford an original Hemi or 440 car-but I bet I could find a 318 version fairly cheap and swap in a snarling 360 or 360 based 408 stroker!!  I'd like to have a '71-74 AMC Javelin AMX. That body still looks cool even today-there are millions of Jeep Grand Wagonneers in junkyards with 360 V8s-and Edelbrock even offers aluminum heads for them. I'd do one red,white and blue with Minilite wheels and sidepipes like Mark Donohue's Championship car. I also like some imports. I'd love to restore a '70-78 Datsun 240 or 280Z. I'd love to have a '70-76 Porsche 914. A new Subaru WRX will blow the doors off 90% of the Musclecars out there-they do 0-60 in just over 5 seconds and the 1/4 in the high 13s. Ditto for a Nissan 370Z. Like Vin Diesel said to Gal Gadot-in "F&F 4" when she caught him looking under the hood of the bad guys Torino-"You like that car?" "I like a fine body no matter what brand it is."  Were all gearheads and were all fighting the good fight against the government and the EPA that want to crush all cars built before 1981. Which includes a friend's 1958 Ferarri Testa Rossa!!  So open your mind and you may be surprised at your next "Dream Car!" Mastermind  

A clone can save you many thousands....If your reasonable....

There's a finite number of premium musclecars, and even if you have an unlimited bankroll-depending on what you want-often the problem is just finding one for sale at any price. As long as you don't try to re-sell it as an original I don't see a problem with clones, although a lot of purists do. Tell me-how does some guy dressing up a '66 Mustang fastback like a GT350H "diminish" the value of your "real" one? Everyone knows his is a fake, and yours is numbers-matching, and the "Real" Shelby will always be worth more than a fake. Get over yourselves. Pontiac only made 697 1969 Trans-Ams. If some guy wants to take one of the other 113,000 V8 Firebirds built in 1969 and contact Year One and dress it up like a T/A-so he has a cool car for say $25,000 instead of the $100,000 plus that a "Real" '69 T/A would bring what harm is there in that? If a guy spends 15 grand on a Mopar Performance 426 crate Hemi and puts it in a nice '69 383 Coronet 2 dr he paid 8 grand for and paints it like a Super Bee,and has 30K in a Hemi Super Bee clone-does that really diminish the value of a real Hemi Super Bee that's worth 150k?  I have a friend who back in the '80's bought a six-cylinder, 3-speed '69 Camaro for $1,000. He dropped in a mild 350, a Saginaw 4-speed, and bought a "Cowl Induction" hood, some Rally wheels from Wheel Vintiques, and painted it like a Z/28. Total cost-$3,500. Everywhere he went people "oohed" and "aahhed" over his "Z/28". He loved it, and eventually put a snarling Rat motor in it, which people at "Show-n-Shines" derided him for for "Ruining" a classic!! These assholes who insulted a stranger for modifying his own car had no Idea that it wasn't a "Real" Z/28!!! He got many laughs out of that!!  So if you wan to buy a '69 LeMans and fake a "Judge" by all means do it! As long as you don't try to sell it as an original, who cares?  Mastermind    

The history of the Z/28.....

Musclecar Review is featuring Z/28's this month so I thought I'd touch on how the "Z" came into being. In the mid '60's the SCCA had a road racing series called Trans-American Sedan Racing-"Trans-Am" for short that was very popular. Oddly-at the height of the musclecar era-the displacement limit was 5 liters-or 305 cubic inches. The 289 V8 Ford Mustang and 273 V8 Plymouth Barracuda did nicely. Ford won the championship in 1966. When the Camaro was introduced Chevrolet pulled out all the stops. Instead of running the little 283 V8 that powered countless Novas, Malibus and Pickups-they took the 327 Corvette block and put a 283 crank in it making it 302 inches. It also had 11:1 compression, a hot solid-lifter cam, Corvette "Fuelie" heads, an aluminum intake and a 780 Holley carb. It was rated at a ridiculously low 290 hp. The buff magazines figured its true output was closer to 350 hp, and that race versions were putting out 460-470 hp. SCCA rules said you had to sell at least 500 to the public to race them. Exactly 602 were sold in 1967 making them legal. The brass couldn't think of a catchy name so they just used the option code-rpo Z/28. Roger Penske and Mark Donohue kicked ass. Winning a lot of races in '67 and the championship in '68. Ford fired back with the "Boss 302" a Mustang with Tunnel-Port 351 "Cleveland" heads on a 302 block. Parnelli Jones and others gave Donohue a helluva run. The competition was fierce and the races were more popular than ever. 1969 was the best sales year to date-of the 200,000+ Camaros sold that year nearly 20,000 were Z/28s. The F-bodies were completely redesigned for 1970-this bodystyle would last until 1981. Since the SCCA changed the rules and now allowed destroking-Chrysler got back into the fray with the new Challenger and 'Cuda by destroking the 340 V8 and Pontiac de-stroked a 400 to build a 303. Roger Penske and Mark Donohue were now racing AMC Javelins with a 304 inch V8. The 1970 production Z/28 now had a 350 V8 with all the 'Vette goodies on it and it was rated at 360 hp in the Z/28 and 370 in the Corvette.  The extra cubes really improved torque and drivability. For the first time an automatic transmission and air conditioning were offered. In 1971 GM lowered compression ratios across the board so cars could run on low-lead gas. This lowered hp to 330. Donohue and AMC won the Championship in a Javelin-but by '71 Ford and GM both had pulled the major factory support so it was kind of a hollow victory-a factory backed team beating a bunch of privateers. In '72 nothing really changed-except a UAW strike at the Norwood, Ohio plant that built Camaros and Firebirds nearly killed the breed. Very few were sold, and 1100 cars that couldn't meet the stiffer 1973 5-mph bumper standards had to be scrapped. GM actually considered killing the F-body line. Only the efforts of Herb Adams and others at Pontiac kept them alive. It was a good decision Trans Ams sales quadrupled that year and Chevy sold nearly 12,000 Z/28's in '73-the best year since 1969. However-the solid-lifter cam was replaced with a hydraulic one, and the aluminum manifold ad 780 Holley was replaced by an iron one with a Quadrajet. For some insane reason-in late 1974 Chevrolet killed the Z/28 option. AMC Killed the Javelin, Ford turned the Mustang into a re-badged Pinto / Capri and Chrysler killed the 'Cuda and Challenger, and Road Runner and Charger for '75. The 454 was longer available in a Corvette-a 350 was the biggest motor you could get and you couldn't even get a 4-speed in California!  Gee, wonder why Pontiac Trans-Am  sales were skyrocketing-they sold nearly 50,000 in 1976-and that was before "Smokey and the Bandit"-that film was released in June 1977. Realizing the error of their ways Chevy brought back the Z/28 in March 1977 after a 2 1/2 year hiatus. Power was an L48 350, but you got a 4-speed with 3.73:1 gears or an automatic with 3.42:1s and sport suspension and graphics that copied the T/A. They were good performers for the time-0-60 times in the 7 second range and 1/4 mile times in the mid 15s. I know a V6 Honda Accord is faster than that now-but these were the darkest days-The advent of Catalytic converters and ever-tightening emission standards killed everyone's performance for several years. '78 and '79 were record sales years. Obviously-if youw wanted a musclecar then-you had two choices-a Trans-Am or a Z/28. "Cowl Induction" was brought back for 1980-a vacuum-operated hood scoop that opened under full-throttle acceleration. It didn't really help performance, but man did it sound cool. In '81-things got worse-you could only get a 350 with an automatic. If you wanted a 4-speed-you got a 305 that wheezed out 145 hp. In 1982 the F-bodies were completely redesigned and this body would last until 1992. The top engine option was a "Cross-Fire" injected 305 with 165 hp,that was only available with a 3-speed automatic. If you wanted a 4-speed you got the 145 hp carburated 305. Yuk. In 1983 things started to get better. The L69 305 "H.O." was introduced that had 190 hp and you could get a 5-speed stick or a 4-speed automatic with it. In 1985 "Tuned Port Injection was introduced and bumped power to 215 hp. As a homage to the "International Race of Champions" race series the "IROC-Z" was introduced.  However-Ford had put the 302 back in the Mustang-with real tube headers and a 600 Holley on an aluminum manifold. The Mustang was not only faster-but several thousand dollars cheaper. In late '86-Chevy stuffed the L98 'Vette 350 into the IROC-Z-but only with an automatic-and they still weren't as fast as a Mustang-that now had even more power with their fuelie 302. The line soldiered on until the big redesign of 1993, that lasted until the demise in 2002. The LT1 and LS1 engines brought great performance in the '90's-but GM priced them into oblivion. A loaded Z/28 was $37,000 in 2002 dollars!!  More than a BMW 3 series, more than a Mercedes C-class, and more than a Lexus IS300!! For a car with a ten year old body, a laughable rear seat, poor visiblity, high insurance rates and 15 mpg fuel economy. Why were 40 year olds-who could afford them buying the luxury / Sport sedans I mentioned instead of Camaros? Because they weren't 17 anymore, and needed to accomodate their wife and kids!  Car and Driver said it best-"This car is absolutely coveted by people who can't afford it." ( Young males under 25.). Ford was selling twice as many Mustangs as GM was Camaros and Firebirds combined. For a good reason-a well-equipped V8 Mustang GT stickered for about 25K-a full ten grand less than a Z/28 or T/A. That's about 300 bucks a month difference in the payment!! Gee, you think that might have made people buy Mustangs??  GM killed them at the end of 2002. The Camaro was resurrected in 2009-with a 300 hp V6 model priced at 22K a screaming bargain. For some reason the "Vette motored LS3 with 400 hp was called the "SS" and not "Z/28". They started about 30K. But again-GM has priced them out of the realm of people who want them. A loaded 400 hp 2014 SS is well over 40K. And guess what? A Subaru WRX that costs 27 grand will give it a helluva run in a drag race or the twisties. So will a Nissan 370Z that starts at 32k.  Yeah-the top dog with the 580 hp blower motor is a rocket and is called the ZL1. I think for 2015 there going to call it "Z/28" again.  But they cost $75,0000!!!  Does GM ever learn?  Apparently not. If I'm going to spend 75K on a sports car-I'll buy a Jaguar F-type or a Porsche Cayman or  a two or three-year old Nissan GtR or Porsche 911 or Aston Martin Vantage or a six year old Ferarri F430 or a '90's Lamborghini Countach!! Not a freakin' Camaro!  Mastermind      

Thanks for being a gearhead,Dad....Happy Father's Day!!

Father's day is Sunday and I thought I'd pay a little tribute to my Dad and all the others that caused us to love musclecars. Except for maybe Shirley Muldowney or Linda Vaughn's kids-It's almost always Dad who turns us on to cars. When I was really little my dad had a 1959 Pontiac Catalina with the Tri-Power 389. That car hooked him on Pontiacs and set the path for me and my brother. He later had a 1964 GTO. It was a 4bbl model, but it had a 4-speed and 4.33:1 gears. It was lightning fast in a drag race, but a little buzzy on the freeway!!  Then we got a 1965 Catalina Ventura. It was red with black interior and had American Racing Torq-Thrust mags on it. My mom was furious-because he traded in her beloved '58 Chevy Impala without telling her. Dad was a mechanic by trade-and he was always working on the side in our garage when he wasn't working at a car dealer. He got really good at tuning and sychronizing multi-carb setups. Word got around the local speed shops and race tracks-so he had quite a fan club. Our street was always packed with GTOs, 'Vettes,Road Runners and Super Bees, 409 Impalas, Hemi Chargers,-anything with a 3-2bbl or 2-4bbl induction system. Street Racers and Bracket Racers alike all wanted an edge-and if my old man jetted your carbs and adjusted your linkage-you definitely had an edge over someone who's car was stock or tuned by themselves or a run-of-the-mill mechanic. He also had the sports-car crowd-Porsche 911s, Datsun 240Z's, MG's and Triumphs,Austin-Healeys-even a couple of Shelby Cobra owners. Dad was good at tuning snd syncronizing SU's and Webers too. He also did motorcycle carbs too. That's how he met Dave Aldana-who was a factory-backed Honda motorcycle racer. Dave's battles at the San Jose mile with Gary Scott and Kenny Roberts were legendary. The neighbors must have hated us. Any weekend it looked like a car show was going on on our street. Like I said in an earlier post-I didn't think it was odd that people like Dave and Gary or Dino Fry or some other racing celebrity was hanging in our garage. I read magazine tech articles religiously-and helped my dad work. My mom always says I could swap valve springs in a small-block Chevy cylinder head before I could ride a two-wheel bike. My little brother's first words weren't "Mama" or "Dada" I think they were "Wace Caw". ( "Race Car" ). I got to hang with these guys-and "The Kid" ( me ) carried a repected opinion. When I was about 11 a neighbor who was always screwing with his car, messing it up and wanting my dad to fix it-asked dad to set the firing order on his Chevy Impala one day. Dad tells me to go do it. I knew all GM V8's were 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2, so I went and got the car started in about ten minutes. I guess it embarrased him, because the guy never asked my dad for help again!!  Dad got another '65 Pontiac-this one a 2+2 with a Tri-power 421 and the 8-lug wheels. By the time I was in junior high I was getting letters and articles published in Popular Hot Rodding, Hot Rod and Car Craft. By high school my dad had bought a service station and we had moved to Nevada. Nevada was adopting California's smog standard's and My dad had gotten one of the first smog liscences in Nevada. We had ever car dealer beating down our door to get cars ready for sale.  I had a smog liscence before I had a driver's liscence. My first car was a Ram Air III, 4-speed, 4.33:1 geared '69 GTO Judge. Who buys that for a 16 year old?  My awesome dad-who over-rode my mom and my uncle who was a cop. The Judge was King Kong. I smote all challengers in biblical fashion. I also lost my liscence in less than a year. About this time dad also had a 1978 400, 4-speed, WS6 Trans-Am. My mom has a great picture of the Judge, the 2+2, and the The Trans-Am all parked side by side in front of our house. Because of me-my brother's first car was a '69 GTO-although his wasn't a judge. He also carried on the fine tradition of losing his liscence in less than a year. In my 20's I also had an SS396 El Camino, a couple of Disco-era T/A's and a '71 Ventura that I swapped a 400 into after totaling one of the T/A's. My brother got into circle track racing. Through it all, dad was always there to burn the midnight oil with us fixing a motor or a clutch, or whatever, and he was usually good for bail money when we needed it!!  His big gripe when me and my brother would screw up was-"Now I have to listen to your mother about this."  Like he didn't give a shit that we'd led the police on a "Smokey and the Bandit" chase, or had a "RoadHouse" fight in a bar-no he didn't want to hear the "Wrath of Mom" which in his mind would somehow be directed at him, not us-Because-"Who raises people that do shit like that??""  I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. He couldn't lecture us too much because his brothers- good old uncle Herbert and uncle Bobby would tell us storys of his antics in the '59 and how they had to come and tow him in or back him up in a fight...Good times.  Were citizens now with kids of our own. My brother's an executive with a liquor supply company that supplys all the casinos in Nevada, and I'm a Service Writer in a car dealership. My son's 20 now-and he always marvelled at how I knew when he pulling shit like I was psychic or something. Dude-do you think I lived in a monastery before I married your mother and had kids?  Anyhow-Dad just celebrated his 75th birthday and him and my brother were talking about turning my brother's old GTO into a "Judge" clone and maybe building a faux RAIV with Edelbrock heads and putting in a Richmond 5-speed. Much to mom's dismay, because that would mean the garage would be occupied for about 6 months!!  Anyhow-Happy Father's day dad-and thanks for all the things you taught me. Some of which we don't talk about or don't mom to know to this day....But I've passed the lead foot, hard fists and hard head on to your grandson-much to his mother's dismay. DNA is a wonderful thing.....Mastermind              

Some cars that never were.....That you can build from junk.....

I have a friend that owns a junkyard and we were talking about how an enterprising hot rodder could build some cool things that the factories never did, and do it relatively chaply. Here's my personal favorites. # 1. Muscle Wagons. Because of their long wheelbase and excellent weight distribution-a wagon actually makes a good drag racer. The obvious front-runners here are the 1968-72 Pontiac LeMans Wagons. Most have 400 cubes and a TH400 standard. Some 1970 and later models may have 455s. Some 1971-72 models will have the "Endura" ( Read GTO ) front bumper and scooped hood. Even if it had the chrome front end-it wouldn't be hard to put a GTO front bumper and hood onto one. How about a "Judge" wagon? # 2. A close second would be '68-72 Olds Cutlass Vista Cruiser wagons, for the same reason-a lot of them have 400 or 455 cubes standard. With the help of Year One and Phoenix Graphics it wouldn't be hard to build a "442" or even a "Hurst / Olds" wagon. You could build an SS Chevelle wagon-but it would take a greater investment-because unlike their Pontiac and Olds cousins-95% of Malibu wagons were small-block powered. You'd have to swap in a Rat. # 3. Dodge Super Bee / Plymouth Road Runner wagon. Take a 1968-70 Dodge Coronet or Plymouth Satellite wagon-if you find one it will have 383 or 440 cubes under the hood. The graphics are easy.  #2. "Off-Brand" El Caminos. Buy a basket case '68-72 El Camino,put a GTO, Cutlass, or Skylark front clip on it. GM engines are easy to swap around. How cool would a "Judge" El Camino with a 400 and a 4-speed be? Or a White and Gold 455 Olds powered "Hurst / Olds" trucklet? Or a 455 Buick powered "GSX" El Camino?   # 3. Thunderbird / Lincoln Rancheros. Same deal here. The 1977-79 Ranchero was based on the LTD II platform, which is the same as the T-Bird / MK V platform. It would be pretty easy to put a Thunderbird or Lincoln Mark V front clip onto a Ranchero. # 4. Cyclone / Cougar wagons. It would be pretty easy to put a Cyclone or Cougar front clip onto a '70-76 Mercury Montego wagon. With a 351C or a 429 / 460-these could be good sleepers.  Something to think about. Mastermind

Don't be a "Big Block" snob... Small Block Musclecars can be fun, fast and way cheaper to build or restore....

Everyone gets caught up in "Big Block" Fever-and will only consider the premium models-especially if your on a tight budget-this really limits you. A small-block car may be the only way some of us can enjoy a classic muscle machine. Here's some examples. # 1. GM "A" body. There are way more Cutlasses, Le Mans, Chevelles, and Skylarks out there from 1968-77 with 350 cubes under the hood than there are with 396, 400 or 454 or 455. The upside is they can usually be bought way cheaper than their big-block cousins, and with a little help from the aftermarket can be made to really run without a huge investment. # 2. GM "F" body. Disco-era T/A's aside-there are way more 1968-81 350 Firebirds and Camaros than there are 396, 400 and 455 versions. In fact-many '77-79 base model, Esprit and Formula Firebirds might have 350 Chevy or 350 Olds engines as well as Pontiacs. The potential of the small-block Chevy is unlimited. We all know that. You can buy or build SBC's with anywhere from 260-550 hp.  With the 350 Olds and Pontiac motors-with intakes, cams, headers, etc-you just accentuate what the factory did-made big torque at low rpm. You can make 350 hp and 400 lbs of torque with these engines pretty easily. That should put a 3,600 lb "F" body solidly in the 13 s.  Beyond that-you need to swap in a 400 or 455 or get nitrous. # 3. Ford Mid-Size. There are WAY more Torinos and Montegos and Mustangs and Cougars built from 1969-76 with 351W, 351C, or 351M motivation than there are 429 or 460 versions. The upside is-351W's and 351C's both have huge aftermarket support and can be made to really run without a huge investment. The 351/400M motors respond ok to basic hot rod tricks-intakes, cams, headers- but their anemic 8:1 compression and huge head ports limit them. Some guys in the "Engine Masters Challenge" have made 500+ hp with 400M's-but their so big and heavy-and the bellhousing bolt-pattern is the same-and they cost no more to buy or build-that you might as well swap in a 429 / 460. # 4.  Chrysler "B" Body. There is a bunch of 318 powered Satellites,Chargers and Coronets, as well as Plymouth Sport Furys and Dodge Monacos-which are techincally "C" bodies-but similar-built from 1968-78. 318 models make nice drivers and get decent gas mileage-but are really underpowered for serious performance work in these big cars. A 360 is a bolt in swap-and Mopar Performance and other people make stroker kits to turn a 360 into a 408. Blueprint engines sells a "Turn-Key" 408 stroker with 375 hp and 460 lbs of torque and a 3 year / 30,000 mile warranty. That should help live out your "Elwood Blues" fantasies pretty good.  # 5. Chrysler "E" body. We all know there are way more 318 Barracudas and Challengers built from 1970-74 than there were big-block models. 318 models can run surprisingly well with basic hot rod tricks-intakes, headers,cams etc- or the 360 or 360 based strokers are a bolt-in. Junkyards are full of Dodge Trucks and Jeep Cherokees with 1992 and later "Magnum" engines-both 318 and 360 cubes-obviously the 360s are more desirable-but "Magnum" heads breathe better than many aftermarket ones, and Edelbrock sells Performer and Performer "RPM" intakes with a "Magnum" bolt pattern. More than enough power to live out your "Kowalski" fantasies. # 6. Short bed 1/2 ton pickups. Millions of short-bed, 1/2 ton, 2wd pickups were built during the late '70's and because of loopholes about GVW-"Gross Vehicle Weight" nearly all of them ( Except California models ) had Catalyst-free pipes until 1978. 350 Chevys and 360 Dodges have great potential. 360 and 390 Fords have the double-whammy of no power and crappy gas mileage-as do the 351 / 400M versions. But their all cheaper than the 440, 454 or 460 relatives. And with aftermarket help-heads,cams,intakes, etc-a "Muscle Truck" can be a fun sleeper. # 7. 1968-79 Chevy El Camino / Ford Ranchero. These Car / Truck hybrids have their own "cult" following. Again-there's way more more 350 and 351W, 351C and 351M versions out there than there are 390,396,429,454 or 460 versions. With any kind of power infusion-your main problem is wheelspin.  Mastermind        

STOP!!!! With what's "Correct" or Original!!...For the common good....

I hate to be such a cynical, miserable, sarcastic bastard all the time, but people drive me to it. Got an email from a guy who wants to buy one of the five 1970-71 BFG "Tirebirds". If you don't know-when B.F. Goodrich introduced the Radial T/A-they also sponsored some Pontiac Trans-Ams to run in the SCCA Trans-Am series. Jerry Titus and Milt Minter won a few races in them. I've touched on it before-the cubic inch limit in T/A racing was 305 inches. When it started in the mid '60s-Ford ran Mustangs and Chrysler ran Barracudas-the 289 Ford V8 and 273 Mopar did nicely. Then Chevrolet upped the ante with the Z/28. They took a 327 block and put a 283 crank in it and made a 302-with all the goodies-Corvette "Fuelie" heads,11:1 compression solid-lifter cam, etc-Mark Donohue and Roger Penske won the title in a Camaro. Which caused Ford to counter with the "Boss 302". Herb Adams and other Pontiac engineers wanted to play-and since SCCA rules allowed de-stroking-they built a 303 inch Pontiac engine with "Tunnel-Port" heads like Ford was working on. In testing they found the small engine ran better with production heads, so that's the way they went. But the 303 Pontiacs had a lot of expensive one-off parts in them, and they blew up a lot. And after DeLorean got promoted-( He allowed Adams and others a lot of slack when it came to racing and "back-door" stuff ) the factory support dried up. The SCCA ruled that since Canadian Firebirds had Chevy engines, it was legal for privateers and others to run the much more plentiful and more reliable 302 Chevy engines in Firebirds. So the races that Titus and Minter won were done with Chevy engines!  Anyhow-this guys question was what would be more "Correct"-should he try to find a 303 Pontiac-which would be IMPOSSIBLE. The last "Real" Pontiac V8 was produced in November 1977. They stockpiled a bunch of 400's for '78 and 79 Trans-Ams. The 303 program was killed in 1969 when Delorean left. That's 45 years ago. Herb Adams and the other engineers are long retired-and the tooling is long gone. And 45 years ago they had a lot of one-off, custom parts-they de-stroked a 400 Pontiac to 303 inches. Moldex and Hank the Crank made custom 2.84 inch stroke cranks to go into the 400 blocks and they had custom connecting rods that were longer than 7 inches and custom pistons-standard Pontiac Rods are 6.625 inches. They had RAIV heads-which are exceptionally rare and prized-Edelbrocks are exact replicas-but their not "original". So even if he had Donald Trumps bank account-the chance of getting a running, 303 Pontiac at any price-is nil. You have a better chance of being struck by lightning. Then he asks-should he try to find a "DZ" code 302 Chevy?  My response-and I don't think I'm being an asshole here-was put a crate 350 Chevy in it and have fun at track days or vintage car races. Or if your super-anal and "Gotta Have" a 302 Chevy-GMPP sells "Bowtie" Blocks with a 4 inch bore and 3 inch storke cranks, so you could build a 302 Chevy if you wanted to. But it's not going to have 1969 date codes!!  How do you restore a non-production race car to absolute "Originality?" Think about it-this car started life as a 1970 Trans-Am. The original engine was an RAIII 400. However-the cubic inch limit in the racing class was 305. So the "Original" "Just as it left the factory" shit is out.  How do we know with absolute certainty-what this 44 year old race car-was originally equipped with? Was it initially built with a 303 Pontiac and had a Chevy engine swapped in it later? Or was it built with a Chevy from the start?  Who gives a f%$k? No one keeps records of vin numbers or how many engines a race car has had!!!  Enjoy it or don't, but stop agonizing over this non-issue!!!  For example-Richard Pettys legendary '74 Charger initially had a 426 Hemi in it. Then when the big-blocks were outlawed-they went to a 360. However-the last "Factory" Hemi Charger was built in 1971. So if someone wanted to restore Petty's Charger-should it have a 426 Hemi in it or should it have a 360 in it?  The same with Fords. Ford built two Boss 429 Cougars-one for "Dyno Don Nicholson" and one for "Fast Eddie" Schartmann. Like with the Boss 429 Mustangs- they started life as 428 models and were sent to Kar Kraft for the "Boss" conversion. However- since these cars were never sold to the public-they were race cars from the start-if someone bought it and wanted to restore it-should he put a 428 in it or a Boss 429?  Dyno Don Nicholson ran a Boss 429 Maverick in Pro Stock in the early '70's. We all know Ford never made a Boss Nine Maverick. So how would one restore that?  First off-Old race cars are money pits!!  Secondly-they were RACE CARS!!!  There's nothing "Original" on them from day one!!  If you can afford to play with one, enjoy it, but don't agonize on it not being "Original".  Mastermind