Can't find the Big-block Chevy of your dreams? Try a Pontiac....

Yes, I know that GTO's command just as much of a King's Ransom as SS Chevelles, sometimes more. But with that exception-all through the lines the Pontiacs are a way better deal with better features for less money. Don't believe me? Consider these irrefutable facts. # 1 1960-68 Full-Size models. About 95% of the Biscaynes, Bel Airs, Impalas and Caprices of this vintage have 283 or 327 Small-Block motivation. 396, 409 and 427 versions are rare, and thus pricey. By contrast-every single Catalina,Ventura,Bonneville,and Gran Prix built during this period had at least 389 or 400 cubes under the hood, and a fair number had 421s and 428s. That alone makes them a better deal-but the Pontiacs are usually priced lower to boot. # 2. 1969-76 Gran Prix. The GP was downsized to the "A" body chassis for 1969, and it was an immediate hit. Chevrolet countered with the Monte Carlo in 1970-but a Gran Prix is a way better buy. Same reason. 99% of Monte Carlos built from 1970-75 have 350 small-blocks under the hood. 396 / 402 /454 versions are rare and thus pricey. Gran Prix's have 400 cubes standard all years, and a good number of '70-76 "SJ" models have 455s!  Any suspension or brake upgrades that fit a Chevelle fit these cars. GTO like performance, and Cadillac like luxury. Dynamite. # 3. 1967-79 Firebird / Formula / Trans-Am. The Firebird is to the Camaro what the Gran Prix is to the Monte Carlo-the better buy of the two. While the 396 was only available in the Camaro from 1967-72 and sold in very limited quantities-and with the exception of the Yenko and Motion and COPO cars-all rare and pricey-there were never 427 or 454 versions. By contrast-you could get a 400 in a Firebird,Esprit, Formula or Trans-Am right up until 1979. If you can't find a deal on a 400 Firebird-you aren't looking past the end of your nose. And from 1971-74 the 455 was available in the Formula, and in the Trans-Am until 1976. # 4. 1971-77 Pontiac Ventura. While most Novas of this vintage have six-cylinder or small-block motivation, the screamin' deal here is a Ventura with a 350 Pontiac V8. The reason-Pontiac V8s are externally identical from a 326 to a 455. That means a 400 or 455 is literally a bolt-in swap. And any suspension or brake upgrades that fit a Camaro or Firebird fit these cars-so you can build a drag racer or a corner-carver if you want. And a Ventura weighs about 600 lbs less than a same-year Firebird. When I wrecked my '77 Trans-Am I took the 400 and stuffed it into a '71 Ventura. It was quite the sleeper and smoked a lot of people who thought they were messing with a small-block Nova. I have nothing against Chevys-but the Pontiac cousins offer way more bang for usually less bucks. Mastermind      

The key is "Biggest motor you can AFFORD".....

A lot of the buff magazines give the advice- "Always build the biggest motor you can afford."  The key word is "AFFORD" and a lot of gearheads lose sight of this. Let me explain. In some instances it's a no-brainer-for example-a 350 Chevy makes substantially more power than a 305, yet costs no more to buy or build. Ditto for a 360 Mopar versus a 318. However in other applications the waters become murky. For example-a 400 Pontiac with the Performer RPM package makes 422 hp and 441 lbs of torque. On a 455 it makes 460 hp and 500 lbs of torque. Is 38 hp and 59 lbs of torque worth another 3 grand? Which is about what it costs for the crank, rods, pistons, rings and bearings, and machine work to turn a 400 into a 455. Don't throw away a good 396 Chevy or 383 Mopar and then spend four grand you don't have rebuilding a junk 440 or 454. See what I'm saying?  A 302 or 347 Ford makes as much or more power than a 351W for less cost. Consider it all. Mastermind    

There's no such thing as a 7 second "Street" machine....

I get sick of magazines talking about their "Real Street" heroes and "World's Fastest Street Cars"- that run the 1/4 in 7 seconds. I'm sorry guys-that's not a street car, it's a race car. What else would you call a car with an 8 or 10 point roll cage,rolling on 29 inch slicks, powered by a 12:1 compression 500 inch, 600+ hp engine backed by an automatic with a 5000 rpm converter and a trans-brake?  Mom's grocery-getter?  Yes, I know anything is drivable depending on what the driver is willing to tolerate-but let's be reasonable. A lot of people have hot rods that aren't daily drivers. I understand that. But a street machine should be something you could take on a 200 mile trip if you had to. Larry Larson's 7 second Nova that was featured in Hot Rod? Sure-you can drive it around the block. But any farther- even with 4.56:1 gears-your 60 mph cruise rpm is going to be less than your torque converter's stall speed. How far toward soccer practice can mom go before she burns up the tranny? "Be careful climbing over the roll cage, honey, and don't step on the nitrous bottle." Most states require any car built after 1975 to have some kind of smog and safety inspection which includes checking for equipment like catalytic converters, EGR valves, AIR pumps, etc. Pray tell-how does one get a 572 inch 720 hp '86 Monte Carlo SS legally registered?  Even if you go old school-i.e. a '68 Chevelle-it's still an undrivable beast. Call me a candy-ass if you want-but most strips require anything that runs the 1/4 faster than 11.50 to have an 8-point roll cage. And the motor buzzing at 4,000 rpm on the freeway and paying seven bucks a gallon for race gas while getting 5-8 mpg gets old real quick. And those big,fat slicks or drag radials are awesome in the rain. These people are pleading a losing case. A new Mustang GT cost 32 grand and runs 12 second 1/4's off the showroom floor with A/C, CD player, cruise control etc. A Camaro SS and a Dodge Challenger R/T cost a little more, but offer the same performance and luxury. And if you step up to the ZL1 or the GT500 or the Hellcat-you get a blower with 580-707 hp!! These cars will idle all day in traffic with the A/C on and still rip off an 11 second 1/4 mile blast on street tires!!  If were being honest-if you really NEED to go faster than that-then you need a Pro Stock drag car, a competent therapist,or a cage. I like old-school musclecars too. But honestly-if I buy a '70's Firebird with a 400 and put the Edelbrock Performer RPM package on it-it will make 422 hp and 441 lbs of torque-on a 400-if I use a 455 those numbers will jump by about 40 each. If I've got a good posi and gears between 3.23:1 and 3.73:1 that will easily put me in the high 12s. A shot of nitrous will put me in the 11s easily, and the car will be dead reliable and except for getting 10 mpg I could drive it from California to New York in relative comfort. Try that in one of the 7 second "Street" cars that are featured in all the magazines. That's all I'm saying. Build a fire-breathing monster if you want-but don't call it a street machine. A stripped down P-51 race plane is an airplane, but no one calls them "Commuter" planes!!  Mastermind        

Thunderbirds with actual thunder.....

Originally concieved as a two-seat sports car to compete with the Corvette ( 1955-57 ) from '58 on the T-Bird evolved into a personal luxury performance car. Some are gorgeous and great performers, and others are ugly and / or slugs.  Here's my personal favorites. # 1. 1961-63. Often called the "Bullet Bird" because of the design of the rear fenders and taillights-these cars still look cool 50 years later. And with 390 cubes under the hood, they move pretty good too. # 2. 1967-69. This is one of the best-looking cars Ford ever put out. Hidden headlights, racy styling and 390 or 428 cubes under that long hood. I personally prefer the two-door models, while some people like the 4-door models with the "Suicide" doors. You can't go wrong either way. # 3. 1970-71. This was about the time American automakers started to care about handling-so these cars are surprisingly nimble for such a big car. Racy, Nascar-inspired styling, and 429 cubes under the hood make these tough customers, and nice drivers. The '72 and later models had 460 cubes, but compression ratios were lowered, power was down and they were based on the heavier and uglier Lincoln MKIV platform. To get a cool T-Bird again you had to wait until....# 4. 1983-88. Bill Elliott won the NASCAR title in this bodystyle. Unless, for some perverse reason you want to try to hop up the 2.3 liter Turbo 4-banger-the ones to look for are the 302 V8 models. Virtually anything that fits a Fox Mustang will fit these cars-so there's great performance potential.  #5. 1989-97. The ones to look for are the Supercharged V6 models or the 302 V8 models. Some '96-97 models had 4.6 Modular V8s-but we know they didn't have as much power as the old "5.0", and theres not nearly as much speed equipment for them. # 6.  1999-2004. This is the two-seat convertible that looks like a '57. Halle Berry drove one in the Bond flick "Die Another Day". They have the 3.9 liter Jaguar V8 that was used in the Lincoln LS and MkVIII. It makes 280 hp, which moves the little 2-seat cars out pretty damn quick.  Any of these make nice drivers or weekend cruisers. Mastermind      

All I need now is a Megabucks win.....

A buddy that works in a Ford dealer let me drive a 2014 Stage 3 Roush Mustang. They wanted $67,000 for it, and I'd say it's worth every penny if I had that kind of bucks. It had the "Aluminator" 5.0 Coyote engine with the Supercharger-675 hp!!. It also had special sway bars, springs and shocks, and Roush even worked with Cooper Tires, developing special tires. The car is like driving a Nascar stocker with air conditioning and more comfortable seats. Roush claims 4.0 seconds 0-60-and I believe it-except it would be quicker if you weren't frying the tires all the way through 2nd gear!!  You can't take off and not fry the tires. If you slip the clutch and hit it 20 feet out, you fry the tires. It's Jule's wallet from Pulp Fiction. Once you get traction-it's a rocket. Its only a couple tenths faster than the 435 hp GT model in the 1/4 but that's because of traction problems. From 60-100 and from 100 to 140 the difference is like 10 car lengths!!  I'd put this bad boy up against anything from a rolling 20-Z06 'Vettes, Nissan GTR's, Porsche 911s-It's that powerful. And if you had a set of drag radials-I'd put it up in a drag race. And the exhaust system-it's loud-but it's the sweetest sound for a gear head, and except for a NASCAR pit, or a truck pull where someones running a Rat Motor on alchohol-you won't hear anything that sounds more badass. Sadly-for 2015 Roush is offering appearance and handling packages for the 4cyl ecoboost,the V6, and the "5.0"-but no engine mods yet. Hopefully they'll add the blower option mid-year. And hopefully I hit a big Keno ticket or a Megabucks slot jackpot. If I do-that Bad, blue Roush is coming home with me, and I can give the finger to my neighbor who has a Boss 302 and a Pantera....Mastermind    

The WORST Movie chases.....

I've talked before and a lot of people have asked about the best movie chases feturing musclecars and weve talked et al- about "Bullitt" "Vanishing Point", "Gone in 60 Seconds", "White Lightning", "Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry" etc. But some people have asked about the worst, most unrealistic ones, and I feel compelled to oblige.  Here's the worst in my opinion. # 1. "Wanted". Even a breifly naked Angelina Jolie couldn't save this stinker. Her and James Macavoy are driving a Dodge Viper, and the bad guy can miraculously keep up in a UPS truck. Not a real UPS truck-but you know what I'm talking about. A GM Box van. Puhleeeze. A Viper would leave that in half a block.  # 2. "The Driver" This is actually one of Quentin Tarantino's favorites, and I have to admit I liked it up until the finale. Ryan O' Neal is a Getaway driver who drives criminals away from crimes eluding the cops. There's a lot of good automotive action, but the finale sucks. O' Neal is chasing a 1976 Pontiac Trans-Am in a 1976 Chevy Pickup!! For argument's sake, if the truck was a 454 it would be competitive in a drag race; but there's no way a truck could corner or brake with a Trans-Am!!!  The T/A would lose him in three blocks!!  And the Ironic thing is-earlier in the film O' Neal was driving a '77 or '78 Firebird.  Now if he was chasing the T/A in that, that would have been believable.  # 3. "Marked for Death" This Steven Seagal stinker is almost as bad as "Wanted". Seagal and Keith David are chasing a BMW 633CSI in a Dodge Ramcharger. If you don't know- A Ramcharger is a 4WD Chevy Blazer / Ford Bronco type SUV.  One of the slowest, most Ill-handling vehicles ever built. A BMW 633CSI is one the fastest, best handling sport sedans ever built. The Bimmer would lose the Dodge truck in two blocks. And-earlier in the film, Seagal was driving a sinister looking black '73 Mustang Mach 1!!  Why didn't they have him chasing the Bimmer in that??  That would have been cool, and beleivable. # 4. "Basic Instinct" Most people remember Sharon Stone getting naked a lot and the famous leg-crossing scene in the police station. I remember Michael Douglas ripping Jeanne Tripplehorn's clothes off and bending her over the couch as much hotter than any scene with Sharon. Anyhow-even though Douglas' Detective character drives a '92 "5.0" Mustang throughout the film- in the one chase scene he tries to stay up with Stone-who's driving a Lotus Esprit-on a two-lane road in a Dodge Diplomat 4-door cop car. The Lotus would have smoked him in under a mile. Puhleeze. Again-why not the Mustang?  # 5. "Fast&Furious". There's two stinkers here. One, Paul Walker and Vin Diesel completely smoke a Ferarri 360 in a drag race in an '89 Toyota Supra. Riiiggghhhttt. I know, the Supra was supposed to be all pumped up. Even if the Supra had 500 hp, ( They had about 250 stock ) the Ferarri-that stock did 0-60 in like 4 seconds flat and the 1/4 in like 11.8-according to Car&Driver- would still have given it a helluva race. It wouldn't have been the ass-whippin they showed. And the end-where Walker driving the same Supra stays dead-even in a drag race with Diesel's 6-71 Supercharged, 426 Hemi powered 1970 Charger!!!  I don't think so!!!   Mastermind            

The 442 turns 50...

In 1964 Pontiac turned the automotive world on it's ear. When they dropped the "Big Car" 389 onto the compact Tempest and created the GTO, the musclecar era was launched. Olds quickly countered with the 442 Package which stood for 4 barrel carb, 4-speed transmission, dual exhaust. The 330 V8 Cutlasss 442 was a nicely balanced package-but just like a 327 Malibu-couldn't really compete with a 389 GTO. The minions at Chevrolet waited for an official ruling from GM-that's why the SS396 Chevelle wasn't introduced until 1966. The renegades at Oldsmobile figured- screw 'em-Pontiac broke the rules-DeLorean griping about Olds offereing the 330 as a step-down engine in the 88, and saying the GTO was an "Option" skirting te small car / small engine big car / big engine rule. In 1965 they put their big 400 inch V8 in the Cutlass 442 making it competitive with the GTO. Oddly-Maybe Olds didn't advertise like Pontiac did-I don't know-Pontiac sold 75,000 GTOs and Olds only sold 25,000 442s. In 1966 Olds even offered a 3-2bbl version just like Pontiac did. However- again-they are quite rare. In 1967 Disc brakes were offered, the Hurst Dual / Gate shifter, and many others. In 1968 all the GM "A" bodies were redesigned. The 442 had a 400 V8, but the Hurst / Olds-concieved by George Hurst had a special silver and black paint job and flouting GM's rule that intermediates couldn't have engines larger than 400 cubes-had the fire-breathing 455 from the Toronado. Only 515 were built, but the performance image was there. Same for 1969 except the H / O was white and Gold. 1970 was the pinnacle year for the 442. The "W30" 455 V8 had an aluminum intake, special heads, a 328 degree cam and was so hot it was only available with a 4-speed and 3.90 or 4.33:1 gears, and no power brakes-because it didn't have enough vacuum at idle to operate power brakes or an automatic transmission!! It was GROSSLY under-rated at 370 hp, and could easily compete with the 450 hp LS6 Chevelle. 1971 brought lowered compression ratios across the board. 1972 had the H /O as the Indy pace car again, but only 629 were built. Sadly-like Pontiac with the GTO, the 442 reverted to option staus on the Cutlass. Thus it was possible to have a mean-looking machine that wheezed out 160 hp with a 350  with a 2bbl!!!  Olds just gave up on performance and concentrated on luxury. The "W30" package-with a few changes-could have lasted until 1979 just like the 400 Pontiacs in the Trans-Am. But they gave up. The 455 was optional in the Cutlass until 1976-but by then it wheezed out 190 hp, and there was no manual transmission option, and the stiffest axle ratio was a 2.56:1!!  Gee, why was Pontiac selling T/A's with 400s and 455s with 4-speeds and 3.23:1 or 3.42:1 gears that ran???  In the '70's and '80's Olds put the legendary 442 Moniker on a bunch of slugs. The worst was 1985-87. You got a 2 door Cutlass with a tape stripe appearance package, "Monte Carlo SS" suspension, and a 307 inch Olds V8 that wheezed out 140 hp and could only be backed by a 4-speed automatic. While Buick was making Grand Nationals on the same platform that ran low 14s or high 13s off the showroom floor!!!  Why didn't Olds lobby for a version of that??  Because they didn't care. The Cutlass was the best-selling American car for many yers in the '70's and '80's. They just didn't give a shit. The Rental-car fleet money was rolling in, and the baby boomers were aging and not caring about muscle-so Olds didn't. But Like Danny DeVito said in "Other Peoples Money" "Get an Increasing Share of a Shrinking Market" "Down the Tubes."  That's why theres no mor Oldsmobile and there's still a Chevrolet and Buick. They changed with the times. Olds didn't. And that's sad-because while it lasted- a 442 was a cool alternative to an SS Chevelle or a GTO.  Mastermind    

The GTO turns 50.....

In late 1963 GM handed down it's famous ban on racing. This was going to hurt sales immensely-especially at Pontiac-who had climbed from sixth to third in total US car sales mainly because of their high-performance image. That's where the term "Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday." came from. Smokey Yunick and Fireball Roberts were unstoppable in NASCAR in their fire-breathing Pontiacs. Roberts won 22 races in 1961-62 a feat unequalled until Richard Petty won 27 in 1970. Mickey Thompson and Hayden Proffit dominated stock class drag racing in their 421 Catalina. Up until then performance cars were primarily full-size cars. At that time-GM also had a rule-big cars got big engines, small cars got small engines. No intermediate could have a standard engine over 330 cubic inches. Oldsmobile dropped the 330 V8 into the 88 sedan and dropped the price-a direct assault on the Pontiac Catalina. This angered DeLorean, who was working with Jim Wangers and Pete Estes to develop a perfromance street car since racing wasn't allowed. They dropped the 389 V8 out of the big cars into the compact Tempest and called it the GTO. DeLorean had hoped to sell 10,000 units; it was a huge hit-even though it was a mid-year option they sold 32,450. The other GM divisions howled to the high heavens and demanded the car be killed. Oldsmobile quickly countered with the Cutlass 442 performance package-but with only 330 cubes under the hood, all it would see of a GTO would be the taillights. DeLorean said-and rightly so-the rule was no intermediate could have a STANDARD engine over 330 cubes. The GTO package was an extra-cost OPTION. And, the GM brass never argued with sales success so the car was here to stay. In 1965 they changed the bodystyle a little and Both engines got more hp the 4bbl 389 was bumped from 325 hp to 335, and the Tri-Power version got bumped from 348 hp to 360. Sales more than doubled-75,000 units were sold. The Goats were king of the street. A 406 Ford Galaxie or a 409 Chevy Impala or a 413 Plymouth Belvedere-all full-size cars would get their lunch eaten by a GTO. The 389 had almost as much power-but the Tempest was several hundred pounds lighter. A 327 Chevelle or a 289 Mustang had little chance in a drag race with a GTO. Olsmobile quickly followed Pontiac's lead and dropped their 400 inch V8 into the 442-which made them competitive but they only sold 1/3 of the units-25,000. In 1966 the freight train rolled on. Sales hit 96,000 units, an all-time high. Chevrolet finally countered with the SS396 Chevelle-and with a dealer network twice the size of Pontiac's-could only sell 77,000 units. 1967 brought some good changes. The body was still basically the same as the record-setting '66 except for the taillights. Front disc brakes became an option for the first time, and for automatic buyers the crappy two-speed ST300 ( read Powerglide ) was replaced by the excellent 3-speed TH400 and could be had with a Hurst Dual / Gate shifter. Engine size was increased to 400 cubic inches, and the heads were completely re-designed to breathe much better. However the 3-2bbl Tri-Power option-which had been a Pontiac Performance staple since 1959 was dropped. GM had said they wanted no more multi-carb options. Zora-Arkus Duntov and Chevrolet defied the order-the 427 Corvette had a 3-2bbl option until 1969-but everyone else toed the line. The buff magazines cried bloody murder. You could order all the parts through dealership parts departments and the '65-66 setup would bolt up to the new engines, and some dealers like Royal Pontiac would even install them if you paid extra. In reality-the 400 4bbl was actually a BETTER perfomer than the 389 Tri-Powers. sales dropped a little-but they still sold 81,000 units. By 1968 the musclecar movement was in full swing. The body was completely re-designed and Motor Trend named it the "Car of the Year".  Chrysler introduced the Road Runner-basically a taxicab stripped down Satellite with a hopped up 383 V8 as standard equipment and the 440 and the 426 Hemi optional. Dodge had the Super Bee-basically the same package on the Coronet. Ford stuffed the 390 V8 into the Mustang, and Chevrolet had introduced the Camaro in 1967 and you could get a 396 in it. Pontiac of course got the Firebird-their version of the Camaro and you could get a 400 in a Firebird. With all this competition they still sold 87,000 units. 1969 brought the introduction of the Ram Air III and Ram Air IV engines and the "Judge" package. However-the other car companies were busy too. Ford stuffed the Police Interceptor 428 into the new Mustang Mach 1, and Chrysler introduced the legendary 440 "Six-Pack" in the Road Runner and the Super Bee. Some dealers-like Nickey Chevrolet, and Don Yenko were stuffing L72 Corvette 427s into Camaros and Chevelles. Still sales were strong-72,225 units. In 1970 GM lifted their stupid rule that intermediates could only have 400 cubic inch engines. Chevrolet immediately stuffed a 454 in the Chevelle-the LS6 had a rip-snorting 450 horses, and that was probably under-rated. Oldsmobile put a 455 into the 442-the "W30" package had an aluminum intake,a 328 degree cam and was so hot it could only be ordered with a 4-speed and no power brakes-it didn't have enough vacuum at idle to operate them! It was grossly under-rated at 370 hp. Buick even got into the fray with the GS455 Skylark, and the Fire-breathing GSX. Chrysler introduced the 'Cuda and Challenger-basically Camaro / Firebird fighters-and they could be had with any engine including the 426 Hemi and the 440 Six-Pack. Strangely, probably because DeLorean had left-Pontiac didn't use the 455. You could get a 455 in a GTO-but it was a generic, "Station Wagon" engine. The high-performance engines were still the RAIII and RAIV 400s. If Pontiac had put the RAIV heads, intake and cam on the 455 block-they could have been competitive with these other monsters. But they didn't, and for the first time there were a lot of cars that could put a GTO on the trailer-something that just didn't happen in the first five years. And Insurance companies were cracking down on performance cars-often the insurance premiums were as much as the car payments!!  Sales dropped way off-40,149 units were sold-almost half of 1969's production. In 1971 due to ever tightening emissions standards and invention of low-lead gasoline-compression ratios were lowered across the board by all GM divisions. Pontiac did build a performance 455-the 455 HO used the heads and aluminum intake from the RAIV, with the milder "068" cam. It was under-rated at 335 hp and 480 lbs of torque. Didn't help-sales dropped to 10,000 units, a 1/4 of 1970's, which was half of 1969's. In 1972 the GTO was no longer a separate model-for the first time since 1964 it reverted to being an option on the LeMans. The 455HO was still available, but sales dropped to a meager 5,807 units. A United Auto Workers strike in 1972 probably didn't help either. The GM "A" bodies were all redesigned for 1973-the hated "Collonade" hardtops. With 5-mph bumpers-they were just plain ugly. 4,806 units were sold-the lowest ever. It was clear to everyone that the Trans-Am was now the flagship. In 1974 the engineers decided to return to it's roots-a big engine in a small car. The GTO was made an option on the "X" body-( read Nova ) platform. Since Pontiac engines are externally identical from a 326 to a 455-and the 350 was an option in the Ventura-the engineers wanted to put a 400 in the Ventura GTO. Now that would have been a rocket!!  ( I know, because I stuffed the 400 out of my wrecked '77 T/A into a '71 Ventura and it was quite a sleeper ). A Ventura weighed 3,200 lbs-about 600 lbs less than a Firebird. A 400 Ventura / GTO would have blown the doors off even an SD-455 Trans-Am-and that couldn't happen-the T/A was the cash cow. So the GTO got a 350 V8 that wheezed out 200hp. The buff magazines cried bloody murder. You could still get a 400 with a 4-speed or a 455 with a TH400 in the LeMans and the Grand Am-which were more GTO-like than the gussied up Ventura. So the car that started it all was put to rest. T/A sales soared in the late '70s, and remained the flagship until GM killed the F-bodies at the end of 2002. In 2004 GM put the GTO name on the Australian Holden Monaro. It had the 350 hp 5.7 liter LS1 'Vette motor and a great suspension. In 2005 they upped the ante with the 400hp LS2 'Vette motor. They didn't sell. The problem was the styling. It looked like a Grand Am with fat tires. Car and Driver called it the "Best Car Nobody's Buying". They hit it right on the head-"It runs like a Corvette, handles like a BMW, and looks like a rental car."  If Pontiac had done what Ford did with the Mustang and Dodge did with the Challenger-go retro and make it look like a '60's or '70's model-they's have had people lined up around the block-Ford can't build enough Mustangs fast enough, and the Challenger is selling like hot cakes. A sad end to a great idea. But if you want a GTO-you'll have to find a '64-72 model.  Mastermind            

"Subjective" is Bullshit....We need to be Objective.....

I'm sorry to deride magazine writers because I sometimes write for magazines-but I just have to vent this. We have to stop the Calvin ( Of "Calvin and Hobbes" comic strip fame peeing on a Ford or Chevy emblem ) pissing shit. I love how magazine writers can rank one car ahead of another because they personally like it better-even though the numbers show otherwise. Here's a couple examples. I work in a Subaru dealership so this one really pisses me off. Car and Driver had a "Sport Sedan" showdown comparing the base model WRX ( not the STI ) against the VW Jetta Hot rod, the Mazda Speed 3, the Honda Civic SI,and the Ford Focus ST. The WRX was the fastest 0-60, the fastest in the 1/4 mile,had the highest top speed,the shortest stopping distance from 70 mph, the fastest lap time around Willow Springs Raceway,and the highest "G" rating on the skidpad. Basically it was #1 in every performance category, and except for the Honda, had the lowest price!!!. Yet the writers rated it #2 behind the Volkswagen!!!  Huh?  How does that work? What math are they doing?  This is not an isolated example. A couple years ago Motor Trend compared a Mustang GT against a BMW M3. They even titled the article "America's M3". The Mustang had 412 hp, the BMW 414. The Mustang was equal or better in every performance category-0-60, 1/4 mile, 70-0 braking, lap time around the track etc-and the Mustang cost $29,000 versus the M3's $64,000 price tag nd they still rated the BMW #1.  Excuse me? The Mustang was equal or better in every performance category and was half the price, and you still rate the Bimmer #1??  How does that work?  I remember a "Crate Motor Shootout" that Hot Rod did back in the '90's same thing. The Chevy was a '69 Camaro with a ZZ3 350 crate engine and 4 speed, the Ford was a '92 Mustang with a 345 hp SVO 302 and a 5-speed, and the Mopar was a '73 Duster with a 360 MP Performance crate engine with a Torqueflite. Even though it was an automatic and the other two were sticks, and they all had basically the same hp rating-The Chevy and Ford were both rated at 345 hp and the Mopar was rated at 360-when the Duster blew their doors off by by a wide margin-more than half a second-which in a drag race-is about 5 car lengths-the editors said that the Mopar had a "rough idle" and only had 10 inches of vacuum at idle!!  Excuse me?  Is your Magazine not called "Hot Rod?"  We weren't comparing a Toyota Camry and a Honda Accord and a Ford Taurus in a "Family Sedan Showdown".  I fail to see how "Idle Quality" factors into a "Hot Rod Crate Motor Shootout". But of course-even though it was the slowest-they said they liked the Chevy best. Shocker!!!  Anyhow-numbers don't lie-we need to remember that and grade accordingly in "Fair" comparisons. Mastermind      

For major bucks it better be perfect....Part2...

Like Dennis Miller used to say-"Sorry to get off on a rant here" but I can't help it. I can't believe the prices some people are asking for piece of shit musclecars. I guess some people are paying it, because that's the market. But I see total crap priced the same as diamonds. Here's a good example-I was searching for GTO's on the 'net. I found a numbers matching, original, 69,000 mile Ram Air IV GTO with the special "OW" TH400 and 4.33:1 Posi rear for $45,000. That's a screaming deal. On the same website some idiot wanted $39,000 for a base-model 1968 GTO that's been "in storage" but hadn't been started or driven since 1991!!! How do you know then engine isn't locked up?  Or the Tranny toast? Or the wiring harness chewed to death by rodents in 23 years of storage??!!  And the owner want's 40 freaking grand for this piece of crap??!!!  When I can buy a running, low-mileage, documented RAIV for 5K more???!!!  Here's another one-more Pontiacs-sorry I love them-but it still drives the point home. These two were both pristine-but the price difference was staggering. A 1978 400, 4-speed, WS6 T/A with 44,000 original miles for $19,900!!!  Or a 1976 400, 4-speed T/A with 36,000 miles for $39,995!!  Hmmm? Which line would I be in?  I guess it comes down to "Buyer Beware". And buyer have common sense. At the last Hot August Nights Auction here in Reno I saw the stupidest thing ever. A "Clone" 1970 Challenger T/A sold for $32,000. The seller admitted it wasn't numbers-matching, that it was a gussied-up 318 model with a 360 crate motor and the "Six-Pak" induction setup. Some moron paid 32 grand for it. About an hour later, at the same auction-a "Real" numbers-matching-albeit a tad rougher-but still in really good shape for a 44 year old car-Challenger T/A went through for 24K.  Hello???!!! Someone paid 8 grand MORE for a FAKE than you could buy the real deal for??  When did 2+2 equal 3?  In Hemmings motor news in the Ford section I saw a 1969 Shelby GT350 Mustang for sale for $75,000. In the same issue-and they had pictures-and it was hard to tell which one was nicer-I saw another one for $44,000!!!  Neither amount is not chump change-but the red one didn't look 30 grand nicer than the blue one!!!!  All I can say is take Smokey Robinson's advice- "My Mama Told Me, You Better Shop Around".  Mastermind          

For major bucks it better be perfect......

I'm amazed at the musclecars that people are asking insane prices for-and the cars are screwed up. RK motors in North Carolina sells a lot of classic cars. They were advertising a 1970 Hemi Charger for $79,000. It wasn't a "Real" Hemi car-then the price would have been 150K. This was a 318 model that someone put a Mopar Performance Crate Hemi in, and a 4-speed and a Dana 60 rear end. But it had 4-wheel drum brakes!!!  Yeah, I want a 4,000 lb car with 465 hp and brakes that fade after one hard stop!!!  Not!! I mean the builder couldn't spend another 800 bucks putting front disc brakes on it?  Like Ditka says-"Come on,Man!!".  They had a 1968 SS396 Chevelle for sale for $49,995. It had no power steering. Anyone ever try to park a car or truck with a big-block Chevy in it and manual steering? Not a pleasant experience. I don't care if it's numbers-matching and "Came from the factory" that way. For 50 grand, it should have power steering and be decent to drive. And again-adding a power box, pump and hoses would have cost what-a grand? And would the value of the car really be "Compromised" by having power steering???  Trans-Am Specialties was trying to sell a 1973 Firebird Formula 455 that was supposedly a numbers matching car, for $38,000. They showed a picture of the dash and the gas guage clearly said "Unleaded Fuel Only". Except-Catalytic Converters and unleaded gas didn't debut until 1975!!  What-you couldn't spend 100 bucks at Year One or NPD and get a correct guage? You had to get one out of a junkyard from a '75-81 model??!!!  And hope no one notices???  For damn near 40 grand it better be perfect!!  They wanted 40 grand for a 455 / 4-speed '73 T/A-that had a big rip in the driver's seat!!!  For god sakes-you can't spend 100 bucks at an upholstery shop getting it patched, or a couple hundred with Legendary for a replacement cover??!!!  If these cars were "fixer uppers" that they wanted 5 or 10 grand for I'd understand, but if I'm going to lay out 40 or 50 grand for a car it better be right. Would you pay 40 grand for a BMW with ripped seats??  Unbelievable. Mastermind        

Some "Muscle Trucks" that might be cool....

If you want to go fast, but occasionally need to haul or tow stuff, there's a lot of cool trucks that make great muscle machines. Here's some of my favorites that can be bought reasonably. #1. 1967-79 Chevy / GMC 2wd 1/2 ton. Small-block versions can be made to run, but the ones to look for are 396 models- ( '67-72 ) and 454 models ( '73-79 ). There is a ton of suspension and brake upgrades, and nothing makes more power for less money than a big-block Chevy. # 2. 1972-78 Dodge 2wd 1/2 ton. The ones to look for are the 400 snd 440 versions. Not as much speed equipment available as the Chevys, but a 440 V8 in a 3900 lb machine is a potent ride whether it's a '70 Road Runner or a '78 Stepside. The '78-79 Li'l Red Express models have a "Cult" following, but their pricier and only have a 360 under the hood. # 3. 1967-79 Ford F100 / F150. The ones to look for are the 390 models ( '67-72 ) and 460 models ( '73-79 ). # 4. 1989-93 Chevy SS454. These had a sinister black paint job,fat tires on chrome wheels and a 454 backed by a TH400 or a 700R4 and 3.73:1 or 4.10:1 gears. Dynamite if you can find one. # 5. 1992-95 Ford Lightning. These had a special lowered suspension, a hotted up 351W and cool monochromatic paint. These have a ton of aftermarket equipment available. # 6. 1998-2003 Dodge Dakota R/T. Mother Mopar stuffed a 360 V8 in the lightweight Dakota pickup, gave it a lowered suspension, fat 17" tires and wheels and a 3.92:1 posi rear. 0-60 in six seconds flat and the 1/4 in the high 14s made these way cool. # 7. 1997-2003 Ford Lightning / Harley Davidson F150. These had cool graphics, special seats, lowered suspesnions and 18" or 20" wheels and a snarling 380 hp Supercharged 5.4 liter V8. Jules' Wallet that can haul plywood. Any of these are a great way to go fast and have some utility. Mastermind

Mustangs in movies......

After the post about Trans-Ams in movies I had quite a few people ask about Mustangs in the movies. Mustangs are fairly prevalent as they've always been a popular car. Here's some of the Instances I remember. # 1. Bullitt. Obvisusly the most famous one-The Highland Green '68 390 Fastback with Torq-Thrust mags has been copied for more than 40 years, and they still look cool.  # 2. "Diamonds Are Forever" James Bond Flick with a convoluted plot and two homosexual asassins after Bond. The only redeeming qualities are a young Jill St. John spends a lot of time barefoot in a bikini, and her and Sean Connery lead the bad guys on a decent chase through the streets of Las Vegas in a red '71 Mach 1. Otherwise its one of worst Bond Films. # 3. "The Mechanic". Charles Bronson should have got an Oscar for his portrayal of a lonely hitman who suffered from insomnia and migraine headaches, who takes the reckless son of one his victims under his wing. Great action, and his protege-a young Jan-Michael Vincent-drives a red '72 Mach 1. # 4. "Gone in 60 Seconds". To quote Tracie Thoms in "Death Proof"-"The original H.B. Halicki classic, not that Nic Cage / Angelina Jolie bullshit"  40 full minutes of automotive mayhem in a Yellow '73 Mach 1 nicknamed "Eleanor". # 5. "Charlie's Angel's" Farrah Fawcett and later Cheryl Ladd drove the white Mustang II fastback with blue stripes. Jaclyn Smith drove an orange Mustang coupe, and poor Kate Jackson got stuck with a Pinto. Come on Ford, even David Doyle ( "Bosley" ) got a T-Bird. Let's be honest no one gave a shit about the cars-guys from 14 to 40 tuned in droves to see Farrah, Jaclyn or Cheryl barefoot in bikinis, or occasionally chloroformed and tied up. Not only did she get screwed driving a Pinto-poor Kate-the "smart" one always had to stay dressed and help Bosley save the others when they were in peril. Hey-we didn't have internet porn back then, so it lasted 5 seasons.  # 6. "Basic Insticnct" All everyone remembers is Sharon Stone getting naked a lot. I remember the scene where Micheal Douglas rips Jeanne Tripplehorn's clothes off and bends her over the couch as hotter than any scene with Sharon. I also remember him bounding up hills in a '91 "5.0" Convertible after "Roxy" tries to kill him with the black Lotus Esprit. # 7. "The Getaway" 1994 version. Sorry guys-a then 41 year old Kim Basinger, while still hot in a Milf / Cougar way-compared to the 24 year old Ali MacGraw in the original? No contest-Ali all the way. In fact Steve McQueen left his wife for her, and she left producer Robert Towne for Steve, so torrid was the affair they had while filming the 1972 original. I'm not just picking on Kim-Alec Baldwin dreams he's as cool as Steve McQueen, and Michael Madsen-while good in Reservoir Dogs-can't touch Al Lettieri as the evil, sexually deviant gunfighter Rudy. And Roger Donaldson vs Sam Peckinpah for director? To plagairize MC Hammer- "Can't touch this."  However Baldwin did drive a '93 "5.0" Convertible, and James Woods was way more evil than Ben Johnson, as Jack Benyon-but that couldn't save it. The original is still way better. # 8 "Hannibal". This sequel to "Silence of the Lambs" brought back Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter, but had Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling. I think Julianne Moore is sexy-and if you read the books, is way closer to Author Thomas Harris's vision of Starling than dykey Jodie Foster. Anyhow- she drove an '88 Roush Mustang in the book and the movie, but sadly no car chase action. #9 "Marked for Death" This Steven Seagal stinker has him driving a sinister black '73 Mach 1, that gets wrecked, and then the big chase is between a Dodge Ramcharger and a BMW 633CSI. Yeah, right-a 318 Ramcharger could stay with a 633CSI for about half a block. Gag. I probably missed some, so feel free to chime in. Mastermind

You don't tug on Superman's cape, you don't spit into the wind...Or "So many A#$%oles, so few bullets"....

Here's an annoying phenomenon that I'm sure everyone who drives a musclecar has experienced. Everyone wants to race you or keep you from passing them. And I don't mean just other musclecars or sports cars, I mean EVERYONE. It's maddening because yes, when I was driving my Hurst / Olds, or my Trans-Am, or my 400 Powered Ventura, or my brother's GTO, etc I would gladly risk a big speeding ticket to put a "5.0" Mustang driver or Dodge Charger driver in their place. Ditto for those arrogant 'Vette drivers, and Nissan 350Z owners, Mazda RX-7 owners and especially 3 and 5 series BMW owners. I'd do it because it was fun, and it was fun because those people are used to winning 99% of the "Stoplight Gran Prix's" they initiate,and I got great joy seeing their eyes widen and jaws drop as I passed them. I have no problem with these people, because their cars are actually fast, and like me their just enjoying their car's performance whether they win or lose. The ones I hate are every thing else. Let me explain, and I'll even break them into groups. # 1. Import subcompact drivers. I'm not talking about Subaru WRX's, ( Which again-are actually freaking fast ). And spare me the "Fast&Furious" rap about 11 second Honda Civics and Nissan Sentras. I have never in my life run across one. But I have run across thousands of VW Jettas, Honda Civics, Nissan Sentras,and Toyota Corrolas with lowered suspensions, fat tires, and exhaust systems that sounds like a broken chainsaw. These people make New York Cab drivers look like safety instructors. They blast from light to light at full-throttle, and cut traffic mercilessly pissing everyone off in their wake. Except their cars aren't fast. One punk with a Honda Civic that worked at the Autozone store I worked at was always challenging my Hurst / Olds to a race. Until the night I blew his doors off in a drag race from a light in my wife's 318 Jeep Cherokee!!!  He was crushed when he reverently said "I had no Ideas those Jeeps were that fast." and I responded-"Sorry to burst your bubble Ringo-the Jeep isn't that fast-your econobox is slow." Another little asshole in my neighborhood drove a VW Corrado with a supercharged V6. Every day for like a month he'd have to blow by my H/O either on a city street or on the freeway and blow the horn and cut me off as he did it. Finally one day I pulled up next to him at a light that turned left and went onto the freeway. Once I stopped smoking my tires and got straight on the on-ramp I put the hammer down. 455 cubes responded and as I pulled even with him the TH400 laid about 30 feet of rubber into 2nd gear and I gave him the "finger" as I pulled away. I kept my foot in it until 5,700 rpm in high gear which with the 3.23 gears was something like 138 mph. Needless to say I smoked him by about 10 car lengths. Funny, every time I saw him after that he would drive like a little old lady or act like he didn't see me and turn right. Anyhow these little shits-( Their always males 18-25 years old ) are like flies that land on your face-they won't stop until you squash them. # 2. Penis Compensator Pickup and SUV drivers. These macho assholes are every bit as annoying as the little boys in the wanna-be rice rockets. No, their more annoying because the little boys will just drive away chagrined. Once in a while you'll have to get out and kick one of these guys asses after they "road rage" you and follow you where your going. These traffic bullies don't know physics. Their actually shocked when their 6,000 lb vehicle with 35" inch tires get's it's doors blown off by something with "less" power. The best one was the guy with the crew-cab SRT-10 Dodge Pickup. If you don't know Chrysler stuffed the 500 hp Viper motor into a few pickups a few years ago. He was utterly aghast when my brothers GTO showed him it's taillights. Hmm-you got 500 hp, but in a vehicle that weighs 5,700 lbs. My brother's GTO weighs 3731 lbs, and ( with the Edelbrock Performer RPM package-according to Edelbrock has 422 hp ). Guess what doofus-78 hp can't overcome an extra 2,000 lbs. My other personal favorite was the asshole with a monster F250 Ford Pickup that had a 460 with a tunnel-ram on it that both my 400 '72 Ventura and my buddys hopped up '83 Camaro sucked up and spit out in a 3-way drag race. "I've got ten grand in the motor of this thing!" he whined. Yeah but it weighs 6,400 lbs and has the aerodynamics of the Chrysler building!! Think that makes a difference.....# 3. Soccer moms in SUVs. V8 Cherokees,V8 Ford Explorers, V8 Toyota 4Runners, Turbo Subaru Foresters, Turbo Volvo XC90's, doesn't matter. Why I want to rape and kill these bitches and not in that order is while their going 70 on a city street where the speed limit is 35 to keep you from passing them or going over 100 on the freeway to keep you from getting over-they usually have two or three little kids strapped in child seats in the back seat!!!  If you blew a tire, or someone pulled in front of you at that speed, what's going to happen to your kids you dumb, miserable bitch??!!  # 4. German car owners. We all know BMW stands for "Break My Windows" right?  BMWs, Audis, Mercedes, VW's, they all drive like assholes and act like everyone else should get out of their way immediately, no matter what. Back in the '80's my cousin had a badass Camaro that had a vanity liscence plate that read 911 EATR. The hilarious thing was-once in a while we'd get in an impromptu drag race or game of cat and mouse on the freeway or a curvy road with a 911 driver, and win lose or draw, the 911 guys would usually laugh and gives us a thumbs up or ask us to pull over and shoot the breeze about cars or follow them to a sports bar for a beer. Typical gearheads. However, that plate mortally offended every other German car driver. He would be cut off, passed, blown the horn at and given the finger by every single asshole who drove a Mercedes, BMW, Audi, or VW. Their all dying off now, but I would go 10 miles out of my way to give the finger to a Mercedes or BMW driver with a "Holocaust Survivor" bumper sticker. You know what I'm talking about-if you accepted every challenge you get every day in your musclecar you'd lose your liscence in a month. But every once in a while, you have to smite one of these insects in biblical fashion because they so richly deserve it. Just had to vent that. Mastermind                    

Hey Hollywood.....I'm available as a consultant....And desperately needed!!!

Musclecars are often featured in movies and T.V. shows, but Hollywood incessantly screws up when referring to them. Maybe for someone who knows nothing about cars it's not a big deal but for us gear heads it's maddening. Here's a few glaring gaffes that I found just this week on cable tv. # 1. "The Butcher". This made for cable action flick stars Eric Roberts as an ex-boxer turned mob enforcer who has to defend himself against the cops and other gangsters when he's wrongly blamed for robbing and killing a rival mob boss. The story and the action are ok, and everyone wants to buy his 1969 Dodge Charger. Except it's a '73 model!!!!  Yet, everyone in the film, including Roberts, says it's a '69!!  And several people say it's a 4-speed, yet when he's driving it, you clearly see an automatic column shifter!!  Arrrrggghhhh!!!!  # 2. "Love Ranch" This flick stars Joe Pesci and Helen Mirren and it's thinly veiled as "not" the story of boxer Oscar Bonavena's murder at the Mustang Ranch brothel outside Reno. They say it's 1976 at the beginning of the film ( which is when it really happened ). What drove me up the wall was they had the boxer driving a 1979 Trans-Am!!  Why? For god's sake they couldn't find a '75 or '76 model?  # 3. "Cold Case". This episode was about the 1972 murder of a teenage boy. On his bedroom wall was poster of a barefoot Farrah Fawcett-Majors sitting on the hood of a white and blue Mustang II, and the famous wet-t-shirt poster of Jacqueline Bisset from "The Deep". Both of them are completely wrong. Here's why. The one with Farrah is obviously a promo shot for "Charlie's Angels". I know because I had the same poster when I was in high school. Except Ford didn't introduce the Mustang II until 1974, and "Charlie's Angels" premiered in September 1976!!!  The "Deep" poster with Bisset wearing only bikini panties, a wet-t-shirt which clung to her awesome rack and showed her large nipples, and a scuba mask was also a best seller. Except the movie and the poster were released in 1977!!!  So how did this kid have them in 1972???  Ugh.  #4 "Vegas". This only lasted one season, probably because it was such a major offender. It starred Dennis Quaid as real-life sherriff Ralph Lamb,Michael Chiklis as a Chicago Gangster who owns a casino and Carrie-Anne Moss as the District Attorney. However, the series was set in 1960. Yet Moss drove a '63 T-Bird, Chiklis drove a '62 Continental with the Suicide Doors, and Quaid drove a 1964 Dodge pickup!!!  # 5. "The Dark Half". This Stephen King thriller pissed me off as both a book and a movie. The Killer drove a 1966 Toronado which is a cool enough ride,but in both the book and the movie they refer to him spinning the rear wheels!! How, when Toronados are all FRONT-WHEEL DRIVE!!!  And in the book they talk about him having a Hurst-shifted 4-speed in it!!! Except all Toronados are automatics!!  They should have had him driving a '60's Pontiac Gran Prix-which is rear-wheel drive,had a lot of power with 389,400,421 or 428 cubes under the hood, and was available with a 4-speed stick. # 6. "White Lightning". This is one of my favorite action flicks and one of Burt Reynolds best. Except when he gets the car from the feds and they show him the engine-He says "Looks like a 429 with dual quads..."  Except you clearly see one Holley 4-barrel under a Weiand Lynx air cleaner. And in some scenes it's a 4-speed-they show the Hurst shifter and him shifting it. In others it's an automatic-you see him put it in park in one scene, and in another Jennifer Billingsley slams it into drive and takes off. Nit-picky, I know, but still.... # 7. "Smokey and the Bandit". Another Burt Reynolds classic with the same problem. In some scenes the T/A is a 4-speed, you see the clutch pedal and him shifting it. In others you see the automatic shifter next to the CB radio on the console. Rumor has it that Sally Field couldn't drive a stick, and that Burt and director Hal Needham just gave up trying to edit it, figuring no one would notice. Well we did. Why doesn't Hollywood hire someone who knows cars to help edit this stuff??  Mastermind                      

"X" might just mark the spot.....

If your looking for a cheap hot rod one that's often overlooked are the GM "X" bodies. I know '68-72 Novas have a "cult" following, but the others are largely overlooked. 1971-77 Pontiac Venturas, 1973-79 Olds Omegas and Buick Apollos can be bought dirt cheap. What makes them a great base for a street machine is the subframe and suspensions are the same as the "F" bodies. That means any factory or aftermarket suspension or brake upgrades that fit a Camaro / Firebird will fit these cars. You can build a "G" machine that corners like a Trans-Am or a Corvette, or a drag racer that will pull the front wheels on launch. The other great thing is the engine bays will accept any GM engine. The Pontiacs are the king sleepers-Pontiac engines are externally identical from a 326 to a 455. That means a 400 or 455 will literally bolt in place of the 350. And a Ventura weighs about 600 lbs less than a Firebird / Trans-Am. If you want to stay brand loyal-a 455 Buick Apollo or a 455 Olds Omega would be a rocker. Or you could swap a small or big block Chevy into any of them, or a late-model LS motor. They have a ton of potential for very low bucks. I took the warmed-over 400 out of my '78 Trans-Am that I wrecked and put it a '72 Ventura back in the '80's. I smoked quite a few people who thought they were messing with a small-block Nova. And I had like $1,500 bucks in the whole car. A "X" body might be just the ticket for high performance for low bucks.  Mastermind  

"I like it, I love it, I want some more of it".....

      Country singer Tim McGraw was talking about sex with a new girlfriend, but I think it applies to a new batch of cars. Dodge is releasing the Hellcat Challenger that has a superhcarged Hemi with 707 hp!!  Chevy has put the 638 hp ZR1 'Vette motor in the Camaro. I was at a Ford dealer the other day and saw a Roush Mustang with a blown 5.0 with 600+ hp. Old-school guys-Listen up-even if your allowed slicks and open headers-these cars will eat the lunch of your LS6 Chevelle or Hemi 'Cuda, or L88 'Vette on street tires. Give the new ones drag radials-and it's not even close. That may be a bitter pill for some to swallow-but it's evolution. The small-block Chevy replaced the flathead Ford as "The" hotrod engine. Deride the new cars if you want-but except for electronic fuel management and ignition timing-it's still old-school hot-rodding. 11:1 compression, more cubes, more cam,putting a big motor in a light car, etc. And it's not only middle-aged rich guys who can afford a $60,000-100,000 car that can play. For 24K you can buy a Ford Mustang with a 305 hp V6 that does the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Ditto for a 323hp Camaro. For $27K you can buy a Subaru WRX that does the 1/4 in 13.8 seconds. A Nissan 370Z offers similar performance with it's 332hp V6 for 29K. In my mind-this is the golden age of automotive performance.  Like I've said-I'm a Pontiac guy-I'd love to buy a '78 400, 4-speed WS6 T/A to play with, or a '72 Ventura or a '69 Gran Prix. But I'd also like to have a new Mustang, or an '80's Porsche 944 or a '70's Datsun 240Z. Like Vin Diesel said-"I appreciate a fine body no matter who makes it."  Embrace these new monsters, and buy them if you can!! Keep the flame burning!  Mastermind    

Trans-Ams in movies......Besides "Smokey and the Bandit:......

After the last post espousing the Trans-Am's importance to musclecar history and survival some people asked if T/A's were featured in other movies either with or without car-chase action. Here's the list of some I remember. # 1. "McQ". John Wayne was offered "Dirty Harry" and turned it down. After it made Clint Eastwood a mega-star-( Clint was well known for the "Spaghetti Westerns" of Sergio Leone-"A Fistful of Dollars" "For a Few Dollars More" and "The Good, the Bad and The Ugly", but "Dirty Harry" really put him on the map ) he realized his mistake and decided to make a modern Cop drama. It actually had a good story about corrupt cops in Seattle and no one plays a tough guy like the Duke,but it was released at the same time as "Magnum Force"-with Clint as Dirty Harry battling corrupt cops in San Francisco. "Magnum Force" was a Mega-hit, and "McQ" got critical acclaim but didn't do much box office. It's still a good action flick and John Wayne drove a Brewster Green 1973 Trans-Am. # 2. "Thunderbolt&Lightfoot." This one featured Clint Eastwood as a Master Thief and Jeff Bridges as his younger protege'. Early on Bridges steals a white '73 T/A. Later him and Clint dump it and steal a '73 "Boat Tail" Riviera. Not one of Clint's better pics-the story dragged and was too convoluted to make sense of.  # 3 "The Star Chamber" featured Micheal Douglas as an Idealistic Judge who's seen too many murdering dirtbags go free on technicalities. His pal Hal Holbrook initiates him into a secret panel of Judges that vote and mete out the death penalty to killers who have gotten off via their personal hitman. There's a cool chase in a parking garage and the bad guys do the most awesome burnout you'll ever see on screen in a 455 powered '73 T/A.  # 4. "An Eye for an Eye". Chuck Norris Martial-Arts thriller filmed in San Francisco. Chuck kicks a lot of ass and drives a Buccaneer Red '73 T/A, but sadly no car-chase action. Chuck had a good chase in "Code of Silence" driving a beater '75 Formula 400 if your interested. # 5 "The Hunter". Steve McQueen's last movie-with the King of Cool playing real-life Bounty Hunter Ralph "Papa" Thorson. He steals a black and gold '79 T/A that gets blown up after a little chase. # 6. "Georgia Peaches". This was a CBS made for TV action flick. It's notable for some good car chase action in a '79 10th Anniversary T/A, ( Which gets blown up ) and a young Tanya Tucker has a cool bondage scene. ( Not quite as cool as Maureen McCormick's ( Marcia Brady!! ) in "Moonshine County Express" but still sexy. ) ( Call me a perv if you want-you same people who wore out your "pause" and re-wind" buttons going slo-mo on Jennifer Billingsley's VERY dirty bare feet in her scene teasing Burt Reynolds by the river. Just shut up and rent the flicks. )  # 7. "Blue Thunder" Action Thriller with Roy Schieder as a Viet Nam Vet turned Police Helicopter pilot who steals an experimental attack chopper from the Army and uncovers a conspiracy and several murders. He drives a Black and Gold T/A that in some scenes is a '79 with a "Shaker" hood and in others is an '81 Turbo Model. The only chase involves Candy Clark eluding the bad guys and the cops in a Vega while Scheider smites them from the air. ( It actually works on screen ). # 8 "Hooper" This comedy starred Burt Reynolds and Jan-Michael Vincent as rival stuntmen. In their movie within the movie they do a bunch of stunts in a rocket-powered red '78 T/A.  I'm sure there's more I missed, so feel free to write in and tell us about them. Mastermind      

The most important musclecar...

Musclecar Review asked readers to write in about what they thought was the the most important musclecar of the last 50 years. Here's what I wrote. The Pontiac Trans-Am is the most important musclecar of the last 50 years. People will argue Hemi 'Cudas, LS6 Chevelles, Boss 429s, blah,blah,blah. Think back to 1974 at the height of the Arab oil embargo. By 1975 the Charger, Road Runner,'Cuda and Challenger were no more. The Javelin AMX was no more. There were no more SS Chevelles, the Z/28 was no more,and the largest engine you could get in a Corvette was a 350, and you couldn't even get a 4-speed in California. The Mustang was more Pinto / Capri than Mustang. Yet you could still get a 455 in a Trans-Am until 1976 and a 400 was available until 1979. Gee, why did T/A sales double or triple every year after 1973? Musclecar buyers didn't go away, the carmakers stopped making cars that they wanted to buy. T/A sales went from 4,800 in 1973 to 10,000 in 1974, to 23,000 in 1975 to 46,000 in 1976 and to 68,000 in 1977.  After "Smokey and the Bandit" 1978 sales went to 93,000 and 1979 sales to 117,000. Chevy realized their mistake and resurrected the Z/28 in April 1977 and '78 was a record year. But he bottom line was-if you wanted a badass musclecar in the late '70's you had one choice-a Trans-Am. Scoff at their 6 second 0-60 times and 15 second 1/4 miles. Yes I know a V6 Toyota Camry can do that now. But in the darkest days when catalytic converters were new-they were the fastest cars available. The T/A like Buford Pusser standing up to corruption in the South, stood Janus-faced against all comers while Motor Trend and Car and Driver were espousing front-drive econoboxes-Patrick Bedard won't admit it now- but he actually raved about the Chevy Citation in 1980. If it wasn't for the Trans-Am we would'nt have had "5.0" Mustangs in the '80's, Buick Gran Nationals, or LT1 or LS1 'Vettes and Camaros or Impala SS's in the '90's. And we wouldn't have 400 hp Mustangs, Challengers and Camaros now. Next time you turn on TNT thank Burt Reynolds and Pontiac for keeping the faith and bridging the gap between the '60's and the '80's. Otherwise-like the "Cat in the Hat" Movie we'd all be driving Focuses.  Mastermind  

"Cold" August Nights......

Hot August Nights is here again and every year I get more disappointed. Maybe it's the economy and people aren't traveling from as far away anymore,or Maybe it's the city of Reno being assholes-Like the Highway Patrol writing tickets on I-80 between VerdI and Reno as you come into town. Yeah,a $200 ticket before I even get into town will make me want to come back!! And the greedy motel and casino owners raising the room prices from the-rest-of-the-year $39-$89 a night to $100-$200 a night during HAN. Yeah, that puts a good taste into people's mouth. And because some Bay Area gang-bangers started a riot 15 years ago, the Police just HAVE to restrict alchohol sales downtown and not allow cruising. And while Vegas has people like Celine Dion and Elton John and Shania Twain and Britney Spears and Toby Keith Headlining at their casinos we get Frankie Avalon and Fabian and the Beach Boys. The "I can't believe I'm not dead tour". Not Faith Hill or Beyonce' or Keith Urban, or even Jerry Lee Lewis or Eric Burdon or John Fogerty or John Kay of Steppenwolf-you know people that actually have hits on MTV and the radio now, or at least had them in the musclecar era and the last 40 years that people actually want to see!! And besides that-I don't care what the organizers say attendance is WAY down from the past few years. I can tell because you don't see any cars anymore. A few years ago-the town looked like it was transported back to 1970. There was '50's and '60s cars all over the streets. Now once in a while you'll see a classic driving around. And the "Show-n-Shines" suck too. Used to you'd see all kinds of cool stuff-Cobras,Plymouth Superbirds,Thunderbolt Fairlanes,W31`Cutlasses,428 Mustangs, 455 Trans-Ams, 396 Novas etc. Now it's cookie cutter the Chevy section is all '55-57s, and 68-72 Chevelles and 67-69 Camaros. You never see a '57 Vette, or a '63 Split Window Stingray or '69 427 Stingray-you hardly see any 'Vettes at all. And no 409 Impalas or 427 Impalas,no Nova SS's no '70's Camaros, no V8 Vegas, No Chevelles or Impalas done in "Gasser" style-radiused wheel wells, straight front axles etc. Ditto for the other makes. The Ford section is all Mustang. Very few if any Torinos,Cougars,Cyclones,Rancheros,T-Birds. Hell I'd rejoice if I saw a hot-rod Falcon!!  Same for Mopar. It's all 68-70 Chargers and Road Runners and a few '70-74 E-bodies-'Cudas and Challengers. No early '60's Max Wedge cars,no Hemi Darts,no Superbirds,no Sport Furys, no Super Bees, again-I'd cheer if I even saw a nice 340 Duster or Dodge Demon!!  It's just sad, because I remember when it was fun. And 1/8 mile drag races in parking lots?  Puhleeze. Come on you cheap bastard Casino owners pay the extra insurance premium and have real 1/4 mile races at Reno-Fernley Raceway or at the Stead Airport like they used to. An 1/8 mile elinimates all the big-block cars from winning. You know that-how many times have you had some punk in a 302 Mustang or 350 Camaro or 340 Duster jump you off the line and then about 60 mph-your 440 Road Runner, 396 Chevelle or 400 Firebird in a beautiful display of mid-range torque-catches and passes him while you giggle like a fiend. An 1/8 mile-if they'd let me enter it-I could dominate in my Subaru!!  Sorry just had to vent that. Maybe the orgainizers will wake up and stop killing the Golden Goose. Mastermind